Clearing the Air
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139


This paper explores the language used by Australian Football League (AFL) footballers and Australian Broadcast Corporation (ABC) journalists in their post-match interviews broadcast on ABC (774 Melbourne) radio. From Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL), Appraisal is used to investigate the evaluative language expressed by the AFL footballers in their exchanges with ABC journalists. Despite the many applications of linguistics to media discourse, especially within SFL, this research is the first to analyse the language of Australian athletes in their post-match interviews. It is found that irrespective of the result of the game, ABC journalists and AFL footballers maintain a neutral stance by countering expressions of positive Attitude with negative Attitude, as well as employing Graduation and Engagement resources that reduce authorial endorsement. These findings are summarized and discussed, including reference to neutralism from Conversation Analysis. The paper goes on to claim that the tenor between AFL footballers, ABC journalists and the broadcast audience makes it difficult for AFL footballers to express authoritative evaluations. The ultimate aim is to show that AFL footballers do well to negotiate a particularly challenging register.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Australian Broadcasting Corporation
    Australian Broadcasting Corporation (2004) Australian Broadcasting Corporation Code of Practice. Australian Broadcasting Corporation, (pamphlet).
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Australian Football League
    Australian Football League (2006) The AFL Explained. AccessedDecember 1, 2006. Available from: afl.com.au/cp2/2/webi/article/014586ag.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Clayman, S. , & Heritage, J.
    (2002) The News Interview: Journalists and public figures on the air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511613623
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613623 [Google Scholar]
  4. Cotter, C.
    (2001) Discourse and Media. In D. Schiffrin , D. Tannen & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp.416–437). Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Du Bois, J. , Schuetze-Coburn, S. , Cumming, S. , & Paolino, D.
    (1993) Outline of discourse transcription. In J. Edwards & M. Lampert (Eds.), Talking Data: Transcription and coding in discourse research (pp.45–91). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Greatbatch, D.
    (1998) Conversation Analysis: Neutralism in British news interviews. In A. Bell & P. Garrett (Eds.), Approaches to Media Discourse (pp.163–185). Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Halliday, M. A. K.
    (1978) Language as Social Semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. (1994) Introduction to Functional Grammar. 2nd edn.London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Martin, J. R.
    (2000) Beyond exchange: APPRAISAL systems in English. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in Text (pp.142–175). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. (2003) Introduction. Text, 23(2), 171–181.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Martin, J. R. , & Rose, D.
    (2003) Working with Discourse. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Martin, J. R. , & White, P. R. R.
    (2005) The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
  13. Owens, J.
    (2006) The Coverage of Sports on Radio. In A. Raney & J. Bryant (Eds.), Handbook of Sports and Media (pp.117–131). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. The Oxford English Dictionary. (2nd ed.) (1989) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Rendle-Short, J.
    (2007) Neutralism and adversarial challenges in the political news interviewDiscourse and Communication, 1(4), 387–406. doi: 10.1177/1750481307082205
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307082205 [Google Scholar]
  16. Thompson, G. , & Hunston, S.
    (2000) Evaluation: An introduction. In G. Thompson & S. Hunston (Eds.), Evaluation in Text (pp.1–27). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. White, P. R. R.
    (2000) Dialogue and inter-subjectivity: reinterpreting the semantics of modality and hedging. In M. Coulthard , J. Cotterill & F. Rock (Eds.), Working with Dialogue (pp.67–80). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. (2003) Beyond modality and hedging: a dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stance. Text, 23(2), 259–285.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Wilson, C. ; & Connolly, R.
    (2006, April 4) Tigers deny infighting, as Eade defends and counsels Griffen. The Age, p.3.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error