1887
Volume 32, Issue 3
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139

Abstract

This paper reports on the preliminary stages of a project designed to investigate communication problems in General Aviation and assess the utility of language technologies as a means of mitigation. The study presented in this paper is the first of a three-part study, in which we aim to investigate the extent to which the English language proficiency of pilots whose native language is not English (EL2) impacts on their ability to effectively communicate with Air Traffic Control (ATC), and its potential impact on safety outcomes. In a preliminary survey, we distributed a questionnaire to General Aviation pilots at various flight training organisations and collected self-reported instances of miscommunication between themselves and ATC. In addition, we asked pilots to rank, in order of difficulty, five typical radio communication tasks. The results indicated that pilots who are English native speakers and EL2 pilots give a similar ranking of difficulty to the radio communicative tasks, and that both EL2 and native speakers rank understanding other pilots as the most challenging task.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.2104/aral0924
2009-01-01
2019-10-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alderson, J. Charles ; Horák, Tania
    (2009) Report on a Survey ofNational Civil Aviation Authorities’ Plans for Implementation of ICAO Language Proficiency Requirements. Report prepared for the ICAO. Lancaster University.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. CASA
    CASA (2009) Airspace Review of Bathurst Aerodrome. Unpublished report, March 2009 Canberra: Civil Aviation Safety Authority. Available from: www.casa.gov.au/scripts/nc.dll?WCMS:STANDARD:1001:pc=PC_90447.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cushing, Steven
    (1994) Fatal Words: Communication Clashes and Aircraft Crashes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Drury, Colin G. ; Ma, Jiao
    (2002) Language Error Analysis – Report on Literature of Aviation Language Errors and Analysis of Error Databases. Report prepared forthe Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). University of Buffalo, State University of New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Emery, Henry ; Roberts, Andy
    (2008) Aviation English for ICAO Compliance, Oxford: Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Farris, Candace ; Trofimovich, Pavel ; Segalowitz, Norman ; Gatbonton, Elizabeth
    (2008) Air traffic communication in a second language: Implications of cognitive factors for training and assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 42(3), 397–410. doi: 10.1002/j.1545‑7249.2008.tb00138.x
    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00138.x [Google Scholar]
  7. Gat, Isabelle B ; Keith, Robert W
    (1978) An effect of linguistic experience. Auditory word discrimination by native and non-native speakers of English. Audiology, 14(4), 339–345. doi: 10.3109/00206097809101303
    https://doi.org/10.3109/00206097809101303 [Google Scholar]
  8. Goguen Joseph A. ; Linde, Charlotte
    (1983) Linguistic Methodology for the Analysis of Aviation Accidents. NASA Contract Report 3741. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Helmreich, Robert L
    (1994) Anatomy of a system accident: The crash of Avianca Flight 052. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 4(3), 265–284. doi: 10.1207/s15327108ijap0403_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0403_4 [Google Scholar]
  10. Hutchins, Edwin ; Klausen, Tove
    1996 Distributed cognition in an airline cockpit. In Engström, Y. and Middleton, D (Eds.), Cognition and Communication at Work (pp.15–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139174077.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174077.002 [Google Scholar]
  11. Linde, Charlotte
    (1988) Politeness and accidents in aviation discourse: The quantitative study of, communicative success. Language in Society, 17(3), 375–399. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500012951
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500012951 [Google Scholar]
  12. Mayo, Lynn Hansberry ; Florentine, Mary ; Buus, S
    (1997) Age of second-language acquisition and perception of speech in noise. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 40(3), 686–693. doi: 10.1044/jslhr.4003.686
    https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4003.686 [Google Scholar]
  13. MacBurnie, Eric
    (2004) Aviation language proficiency. ICAO Journal, 59(1), 4–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. McMillan, David
    (1998) “…Say again?…” Miscommunications in air traffic control. Unpublished master’s thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Mell, Jeremy
    (n.d.). “Emergency Calls - Messages out of the blue”. Toulouse: Ecole Nationale de I’Aviation Civile. Available fromwww.icao.int/anb/sg/pricesg/background/OotB.htm.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Nevile, Maurice
    (2001) Understanding who’s who in the airline cockpit: Pilots’ pronominal choices and cockpit roles. In McHoul, A. ; Rapley, M. (Eds.), How to Analyse Talk in Institutional Settings: A Casebook of Methods. London: Continuum.
  17. (2005) “Checklist complete” Or is it? Closing a task in the airline cockpit. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 28(2), 60–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. (2006) Communication in Context: A Conversational Analysis Tool for Examining Recorded Voice Data in Investigations of Aviation Occurrences. Report prepared forthe Australian Transport Safety Bureau. ATSB Research and Analysis Report B2005/0118.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. (2007) Action in time: Ensuring timeliness for collaborative work in the airline cockpit. Language in Society, 36(2), 233–257. doi: 10.1017/S0047404507070121
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404507070121 [Google Scholar]
  20. (2008) Being out of order: Overlapping talk as evidence of trouble in airline pilots’ work. In Bhatia, Vijay K. ; Flowerdew, John ; Jones, Rodney H. (Eds.), Advances in Discourse Studies. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Nevile Maurice ; Walker, Michael
    (2005) A Context for Error: Using Conversational Analysis to Represent and Analyse Recorded Voice Data. Report prepared forthe Australian Transport Safety Bureau. ATSB Aviation Research Report B2005/0108.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Oliveira, Kelly
    (2007, February). Command of English would have prevented Brazil’s worst air tragedy ever. Brazzil Magazine. Available fromwww.brazzilmag.com.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Prinzo, O. Veronika
    (2008) The computation and effects of air traffic control message complexity and message length on pilot readback performance. In Spink, A.J. ; Ballintign, M.R ; Bogers, N.D. , Grieco, F. ; Loijens, L.W.S. ; Noldus, L.P.J.J ; Smit, G. , and Zimmerman, P.H. (Eds.), Proceedings of Measuring Behavior 2008 (Maastricht, The Netherlands, August 26-29, 2008).
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Shimizu, Takashi ; Makishima, Kazumi ; Yoshida, Masafumi ; Yamagishi, Hidetoshi
    (2002) Effect of background noise on perception of English speech for Japanese listeners. Auris Nasus Larynx, 29, 121–125. doi: 10.1016/S0385‑8146(01)00133‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0385-8146(01)00133-X [Google Scholar]
  25. Sullivan, Patricia ; Girginer, Handan
    (2002) The use of discourse analysis to enhance ESP teacher knowledge: An example using aviation English. English for Specific Purposes21(4), 397–404. doi: 10.1016/S0889‑4906(01)00042‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(01)00042-4 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.2104/aral0924
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error