1887
Volume 32, Issue 3
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139

Abstract

This article describes and analyses the development of a new test of aviation English by the Finnish Civil Aviation Authority (FCAA), as well as the overall situation in Finland as regards the testing of aviation English. The article describes the FCAA development project and evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of the new test and the whole testing system, often with reference to the framework of test usefulness proposed by Bachman and Palmer (1996). The quality of the overall system in Finland appears to be quite variable as it is based on the principle of decentralization, in which the FCAA evaluates and approves different tests to be used for certifying the English language skills of aviation personnel. On the other hand, the FCAA commissioned the creation of a test of its own, which appears to have certain strengths, but also has some flaws, such as a lack of systematic double rating of speaking and very little centralized monitoring of overall quality.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.2104/aral0926
2009-01-01
2019-10-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alderson, J. Charles
    (2008) Final Report on a Survey of Aviation English Tests. Lancaster: Lancaster University.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alderson, J. Charles .; Al-Zadjali, Rima .; Banerjee, Jayanti .; Horák, Tania .; Papageorgiou, Spiros .; van Moere, Alistar
    (2007) ELPAC Final Validation Report. Lancaster: Lancaster University.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Alderson, J. Charles .; Clapham, Caroline .; Wall, Diane
    (1995) Language Test Construction and Evaluation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Alderson, J. Charles .; Horák, Tania
    (2008) Report on a Survey of National Civil Aviation Authorities’ Plans for Implementation of ICAO Language Proficiency Requirements. Lancaster: Lancaster University.
  5. Bachman, Lyle F. ; Palmer, Adrian S.
    (1996) Language Testing in Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Douglas, Dan
    (2000) Assessing Languages for Specific Purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hambleton, R ; Jaeger, Richard ; Plake, Barbara ; Mills, Craig
    (2000) Setting performance standards on complex educational assessments. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24(4), 355–366. doi: 10.1177/01466210022031804
    https://doi.org/10.1177/01466210022031804 [Google Scholar]
  8. ICAO
    ICAO (2004) Manual on the Implementation of the ICAO Language Proficiency Requirements– Doc 9835-AN/453. Montreal: International Civil Aviation Organization.
  9. Kaftandjieva, Felianka
    (2004) Standard setting. In Reference Supplement to the Preliminary Pilot Version of the Manual for Relating Language Examinations to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment (Section B., pp1–43). Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Knoch, Ute
    (2009) Collaborating with ESP stakeholders in rating scale validation: The case of the ICAO rating scale. Spaan Fellow Working Papers in Second Language Assessment, 7, 21–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Messick, Samuel
    (1989) Validity. In Linn, Robert. L. (Ed.), Educational Measurement (3rd ed., pp.13–103). New York: American Council on Education and Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Weir, Cyril
    (1993) Understanding and Developing Language Tests. New York: Prentice Hall.
  13. (2005) Language Testing and Validation. An Evidence-Based Approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230514577
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230514577
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.2104/aral0926
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error