Volume 33, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139


This paper considers the embodied nature of discourse for a professional work setting. It examines language in interaction in the airline cockpit, and specifically how shifts in pilots’ eye gaze direction can indicate the action of talk, that is, what talk is doing and its relative contribution to work-in-progress. Looking towards the other pilot’s face treats talk as occurring outside the predictable and scripted sequential flow of interaction for work. The talk might be casual conversation unrelated to work tasks, or involve negotiation of work arising from locally contingent circumstances. Pilots treat particular sites for looking, cockpit instrument panels and windows, as a home position for gaze for planned and predictable work activity. Looking away from this home position, as either speaker or recipient, treats talk as doing something else. The paper draws on insights and methods of conversation analysis, and uses naturally occurring data, video recordings of pilots at work on actual scheduled passenger flights.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Arminen, Ilkka
    (2005) Institutional interaction: Studies of talk at work. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brumfit, Christopher
    (2004) Applied linguistics in 2004. Unity in diversity?AILA Review, 17: 133–136.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Coupland, Justine
    (Ed.) (2000) Small talk. Edinburgh Gate, UK: Pearson Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Davies, A. ; Elder, C.
    (Eds) (2004) The handbook of applied linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470757000
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757000 [Google Scholar]
  5. Faith, Nicholas
    (1998) Black box (2nd ed.). London: Boxtree.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Gardner, Rod
    (2004) Conversation analysis. In A. Davies & C. Elder , (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp.262–284). Oxford: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470757000.ch10
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757000.ch10 [Google Scholar]
  7. Goodwin, Charles
    (1981) Conversational organization: interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. (1994) Professional vision, American Anthropologist, 96(3): 606–633. doi: 10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100 [Google Scholar]
  9. (2003) The body in action. In J. Coupland & R. Gwyn , (Eds.), Discourse, the body, and identity (pp.19–42). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9781403918543_2
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403918543_2 [Google Scholar]
  10. Haddington, Pentti
    (2006) The organization of gaze and assessments as resources for stance taking. Text and Talk26(3): 281–328. doi: 10.1515/TEXT.2006.012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2006.012 [Google Scholar]
  11. . (in press). Turn-taking for turntaking: mobility, time and action in the sequential organization of junction-negotiations in cars. Research on Language and Social Interaction.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Haddington, Pentti ; Keisanen, Tiina
    (2009) Location, mobility and the body as resources in selecting a route [Special issue]. Journal of Pragmatics, 41: 1938–1961. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.018
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.018 [Google Scholar]
  13. Kidwell, Mardi
    (2006) “Calm down!”: the role of gaze in the interactional management of hysteria by the police. Discourse Studies, 8: 745–770. doi: 10.1177/1461445606069328
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606069328 [Google Scholar]
  14. Kidwell, Mardi ; Zimmerman, Don
    (2007) Joint attention as action. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(3): 592–611. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.012 [Google Scholar]
  15. Laurier, Eric
    (2005) Searching for a parking space. Intellectica41-42 (2-3): 101–116.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lerner, Gene
    (2003) Selecting next speaker: the context-sensitive operation of a context-free organization. Language in Society. 32(2): 177–201. doi: 10.1017/S004740450332202X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450332202X [Google Scholar]
  17. Nevile, Maurice
    (2004a) Beyond the Black Box: Talk-in-Interaction in the Airline Cockpit. Aldershot: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. (2004b) Integrity in the airline cockpit: embodying claims about progress for the conduct of an approach briefing. Research on Language and Social Interaction37(4): 447–480. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3704_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3704_3 [Google Scholar]
  19. (2007) Seeing the point: attention and participation in the airline cockpit. In L. Mondada & V. Markaki , (Eds.), Interacting bodies. Online proceedings of the 2nd international conference of the International Society for Gesture Studies. Lyon: ENS LSH & ICAR Research Lab. Available atgesture-lyon2005.ens-lsh.fr/article.php3?id_article=245.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Nevile, Maurice ; Rendle-Short, Johanna
    (2007) Language as action. [Special issue]. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 30(3):30.1–30.13. doi: 10.1075/aral.30.3.01nev
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.30.3.01nev [Google Scholar]
  21. Rendle-Short, Johanna
    (2003) So what does that show us? analysis of the discourse marker “so” in monologic talk. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 26(2): 46–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Robinson, Jeffrey
    (1998) Getting down to business: talk, gaze, and body orientation during openings of doctor-patient consultations. Human Communication Research, 25(1): 97–123. doi: 10.1111/j.1468‑2958.1998.tb00438.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1998.tb00438.x [Google Scholar]
  23. Robinson, Jeffrey D ; Stivers, Tanya
    (2001) Achieving activity transitions in physician-patient encounters: from history taking to physical examination. Human Communication Research, 27(2): 253–298.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Sacks, Harvey ; Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    (2002) Home position. Gesture, 2(2): 133–146. doi: 10.1075/gest.2.2.02sac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.2.2.02sac [Google Scholar]
  25. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    (1998) Body torque. Social Research, 65(3): 535–596.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Schegloff, Emanuel A. ; Koshik, Irene ; Jacoby, Sally ; Olsher, David
    (2002) Conversation analysis and applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22: 3–31. doi: 10.1017/S0267190502000016
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190502000016 [Google Scholar]
  27. Stivers, Tanya ; Heritage, John
    (2001) Breaking the sequential mold: answering “more than the question” during comprehensive history taking. Text, 21(1/2): 151–185.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Suchman, Lucy
    (1996) Constituting shared workspaces. In Y. Engström & D. Middleton , (Eds.), Cognition and Communication at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139174077.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174077.003 [Google Scholar]
  29. ten Have, Paul
    (2007) Doing conversation analysis: a practical guide (2nd Ed.). London: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781849208895
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208895 [Google Scholar]
  30. Trappes-Lomax, Hugh
    (2004) Discourse analysis. In A. Davies & C. Elder , (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470757000.ch5
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757000.ch5 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error