1887
Volume 33, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Review of Pecorari, D. (2008) Academic writing and plagiarism: A linguistic analysis, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/aral.33.2.10ste-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.2104/aral1023
2010-01-01
2019-10-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Fairclough, Norman
    (1992) Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Howard, R
    (1995) Plagiarisms, authorships and the academic death penalty. College English, 57, 788–805. doi: 10.2307/378403
    https://doi.org/10.2307/378403 [Google Scholar]
  3. Hyland, K
    (1999) Academic attribution: citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 20 (3), 341–367. doi: 10.1093/applin/20.3.341
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/20.3.341 [Google Scholar]
  4. Stevenson, Marie
    (2006) The reporting language and integration of source materials in the essays of commencing university students. Dissertation for Master of Applied Linguistics, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
  5. Swales, John
    (1990) Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Thompson, Geoff ; Ye, Y
    (1991 )  Evaluation of the reporting verbs used in academic.papers. Applied Linguistics, 12, 365–382. doi: 10.1093/applin/12.4.365
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/12.4.365 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.2104/aral1023
Loading
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error