1887
Sociocognitive Approaches to Second Language Pedagogy
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139

Abstract

In today’s second language classrooms, students are often asked to work in pairs or small groups. Such collaboration can take place face-to-face, but now more often via computer mediated communication. This paper reports on a study which investigated the effect of the medium of communication on the nature of pair interaction. The study involved six pairs of beginner participants in a Chinese class completing seven different tasks. Each task was completed twice, once face to face (FTF), and once via computer mediated communication (CMC). All pair talk was audio recorded, and on-line communication was logged. Using Storch’s (2002) model of patterns of pair interaction, five patterns were identified: collaborative, cooperative, dominant/dominant, dominant/passive and expert/novice. The medium of communication was found to affect the pattern of interaction. In CMC some pairs became more collaborative, or cooperative. The implications of these findings for language teaching, particularly for the use of CMC in language classes, are discussed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.2104/aral1027
2010-01-01
2019-10-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abrams, Zsuzsanna Ittzes
    (2003) The effect of synchronous and asynchronous CMC on oral performance in German. Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 157–167. doi: 10.1111/1540‑4781.00184
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00184 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aldosari, Ali ; Storch, Neomy
    (2006, July). Investigating pair work: The role of L1 in social relations across proficiency levels. Paper presented atthe Applied Linguistics Association of Australia conference, Brisbane, Australia.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Beauvois, Margaret Healy
    (1992) Computer-assisted classroom discussion in the foreign language classroom: Conversation in slow motion. Foreign Language Annals, 25(5), 455–464. doi: 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.1992.tb01128.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1992.tb01128.x [Google Scholar]
  4. Blake, Robert
    (2000) Computer mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 4, 120–136.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Donato, Richard
    (1994) Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf and G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33–56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Firth, Alan ; Wagner, Johannes
    (1997) On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 285–300. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1997.tb05480.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05480.x [Google Scholar]
  7. (2007) On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in second language acquisition research. Modern Language Journal, 91, 755–770. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2007.00667.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00667.x [Google Scholar]
  8. Gass, Susan ; Varonis, Evangeline
    (1986) Sex differences in NNS/NNS interactions. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: conversations in SLA (pp. 327–351). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Ives, Debra
    (2004) Three NS-NNS upper primary school pairs. A case study. Australian Language & Literacy Matters. 1(4), 11–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kelm, Orlando
    (1992) The use of synchronous and computer-networks in second language instruction: A preliminary report. Foreign Language Annals, 25(5), 441–454. doi: 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.1992.tb01127.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1992.tb01127.x [Google Scholar]
  11. Kitade, Keiko
    (2000) Learners’ discourse and SLA theories in CMC: Collaborative interaction in Internet chat. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13(2), 143–166. doi: 10.1076/0958‑8221(200004)13:2;1‑D;FT143
    https://doi.org/10.1076/0958-8221(200004)13:2;1-D;FT143 [Google Scholar]
  12. Lantolf, James
    (2000) Second language learning as a mediated process. Language Teaching, 33, 79–96. doi: 10.1017/S0261444800015329
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800015329 [Google Scholar]
  13. Lantolf, James ; Thorne, Steven
    (2006) Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  14. Long, Michael
    (1983) Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible inputApplied Linguistics, 4(2), 126–141. doi: 10.1093/applin/4.2.126
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/4.2.126 [Google Scholar]
  15. (1996) The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie and T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of language acquisition (pp. 413–468). New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Long, Michael ; Porter, Patricia A.
    (1985) Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 19(2), 207–227. doi: 10.2307/3586827
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3586827 [Google Scholar]
  17. Mackey, Alison
    (1999) Input, interaction, and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 557–587. doi: 10.1017/S0272263199004027
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263199004027 [Google Scholar]
  18. Ohta, Amy
    (2001) Second language acquisition processes in the classroom: Learning Japanese. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Pica, Theresa ; Holliday, Lloyd ; Lewis, Nora ; Berducci, Dom ; Newman, Jeanne
    (1991) Language learning through interaction: What role does gender play?Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 343–376. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100010020
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100010020 [Google Scholar]
  20. Roed, Jannie
    (2003) Language and learner behaviour in a virtual environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16(2–3), 155–172.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Schmidt, Richard
    (1993) Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics13, 206–226. doi: 10.1017/S0267190500002476
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500002476 [Google Scholar]
  22. (2001) Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139524780.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524780.003 [Google Scholar]
  23. Storch, Neomy
    (2002) Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52(1), 119–158. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9922.00179
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00179 [Google Scholar]
  24. Strauss, Pat ; U. Alice
    (2007) Group assessments: dilemmas facing lecturers in multicultural tertiary classrooms. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(2), 147–161. doi: 10.1080/07294360701310789
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360701310789 [Google Scholar]
  25. Swain, Merrill
    (2000) The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Swain, Merrill ; Lapkin, Sharon
    (1998) Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 320–337. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1998.tb01209.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01209.x [Google Scholar]
  27. Vygotsky, Lev
    (1978) Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Warschauer, Mark
    (1996) Comparing face-to-face and electronic communication in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13(2), 7–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Watanabe, Yoshinori
    (2004) Collaborative dialogue between ESL learners of different proficiency levels: Linguistic and affective outcomes. Unpublished Master thesis, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, The University of Toronto, Canada.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Wigglesworth, Gillian ; Storch, Neomy
    (2009) Pair versus individual writing: Effects on fluency, complexity and accuracy. Language Testing. 26(3), 445–466. doi: 10.1177/0265532209104670
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209104670 [Google Scholar]
  31. Xie, Tianwei
    (2002) Using Internet relay chat in teaching Chinese. CALICO Journal, 19(3), 513–524.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.2104/aral1027
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error