1887
Sociocognitive Approaches to Second Language Pedagogy
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139

Abstract

Methods for analysing interlanguage have long aimed to capture learner language in its own right. By surveying the cognitive methods of Error Analysis, Obligatory Occasion Analysis and Frequency Analysis, this paper traces reformulations to attain this goal. The paper then focuses on Emergence Analysis, which fine-tunes learner language analysis by measuring the ‘onset’ of spoken grammar as hypothesised in Processability Theory (PT) (Pienemann, 1998, 2005a). Since doubts have been expressed regarding the emergence approach’s rigour and pedagogical relevance, a study is presented which aims to provide a more in-depth and wide-ranging account of the ‘onset’ of. English grammar. Having sketched and amplified Processability Theory’s predictions, the paper applies emergence analysis to the longitudinal development of two adolescent ESL learners. As well as exemplifying the rigour of the emergence procedures, the results show overall support for the more comprehensive predictions. The paper concludes that learner language analysis does not have a deficit emphasis on transition to the target language, as claimed by Firth and Wagner (1997, 2007). Indeed, such methods have a role in assessing developmental readiness in a learner-oriented approach to grammar teaching.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.2104/aral1030
2010-01-01
2019-10-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bley-Vroman, Robert
    (1983) The comparative fallacy in interlanguage studies: The case of systematicity. Language Learning, 33, 1–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1983.tb00983.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1983.tb00983.x [Google Scholar]
  2. Bresnan, Joan
    (2001) Lexical-functional syntax. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Corder, S.
    (1967) The significance of learners’ errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 5, 161–169. doi: 10.1515/iral.1967.5.1‑4.161
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1967.5.1-4.161 [Google Scholar]
  4. Di Biase, Bruno
    (2008) Focus-on-form and development in L2 learning. In J.-U. Kessler , (Ed.), Processability approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 197–220). Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Dulay, Heidi ; Burt, Marina
    (1973) Should we teach children syntax?Language Learning, 23, 245–258. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1973.tb00659.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1973.tb00659.x [Google Scholar]
  6. Dyson, Bronwen
    (2004) Developmental style in second language processing: A study of inter-learner variation in the acquisition of English as a Second Language. Doctoral dissertation, University of Western Sydney, Australia.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. (2008) What we learn from questions: ESL question development and its implications for language assessment, Prospect, 23(1), 16–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. (2009a) Processability Theory and the role of morphology in ESL development: A longitudinal study. Second Language Research, 25(3), 355–376. doi: 10.1177/0267658309104578
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658309104578 [Google Scholar]
  9. (2009b) Understanding trajectories of academic literacy: How could this improve diagnostic assessment. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 3(1), 52–69.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ellis, Rod ; Barkuizen, Gary
    (2005) Analysing learner language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Falk, Yehud
    a(2008) Functional relations in the English auxiliary system. Linguistics, 46(5), 861–889. doi: 10.1515/LING.2008.028
    https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2008.028 [Google Scholar]
  12. Firth, A ; Wagner, J
    (1997) On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. The Modern Language Journal, 81, 285–300. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1997.tb05480.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05480.x [Google Scholar]
  13. Firth, Alan ; Wagner, Johannes
    (2007) Second/foreign language learning as a social accomplishment: elaborations on a reconceptualized SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 800–819. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2007.00670.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00670.x [Google Scholar]
  14. Hudson, Thom
    (1993) Nothing does not equal zero: Problems with applying development sequence findings to assessment and pedagogy. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 461–494. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100012389
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100012389 [Google Scholar]
  15. Kawaguchi, Satomi
    (2005) Argument structure and syntactic developments in Japanese as a second language. In M. Pienemann , (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory (pp. 254–298). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/sibil.30.10kaw
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.30.10kaw [Google Scholar]
  16. Klein, Wolfgang ; Purdue, Clive
    (1992) Utterance structure: developing grammars again. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sibil.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.5 [Google Scholar]
  17. Lafford, Barbara
    (2007) Second Language Acquisition reconceptualized?:The impact of Firth and Wagner (1997 Modern Language Journal, 91, 735–756. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2007.00666.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00666.x [Google Scholar]
  18. Lightbown, Patsy
    (1998) The importance of timing in focus on form. In C. Doughty and J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, (pp. 177–196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Mansouri, Fethi
    (2005) Agreement morphology in Arabic as a second language: Typological features and their processing implications. In M. Pienemann . (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory (pp. 117–153). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/sibil.30.06man
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.30.06man [Google Scholar]
  20. Mansouri, Fethi ; Duffy, Loretta
    (2005) The pedagogic effectiveness of developmental readiness in ESL grammar instruction. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 81–99.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Meisel, Jurgen ; Clahsen, Harald ; Pienemann, Manfred
    (1981) On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 3, 109–135. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100004137
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100004137 [Google Scholar]
  22. Mondada, Lorenza ; Pekarek-Doehler, Simona
    (2004) Second Language Acquisition as situated practice: task accomplishment in the French second language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 501–518. doi: 10.1111/j.0026‑7902.2004.t01‑15‑.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-15-.x [Google Scholar]
  23. Parodi, Teresa
    (2000) Finiteness and verb placement in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 16(4), 255–381.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Pallotti, Gabrielle
    (2007) An operational definition of the emergence criterion. Applied Linguistics, 28(3), 361–382. doi: 10.1093/applin/amm018
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm018 [Google Scholar]
  25. Pienemann, Manfred
    (1984) Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6 (2), 186–214. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100005015
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100005015 [Google Scholar]
  26. (1989) Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics, 1, 52–79. doi: 10.1093/applin/10.1.52
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/10.1.52 [Google Scholar]
  27. (1998) Language processing and second language development: Processability theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/sibil.15
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.15 [Google Scholar]
  28. (Ed.) (2005a) Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/sibil.30
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.30 [Google Scholar]
  29. (2005b) An introduction to Processability Theory. In Pienemann, Manfred . (Ed.). Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory (pp. 1–60). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/sibil.30.03pie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.30.03pie [Google Scholar]
  30. Pienemann, Manfred ; Di Biase, Bruno ; Kawaguchi, Satomi
    (2005) Extending Processability Theory. In M. Pienemann . (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory (pp. 199–252). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/sibil.30.09pie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.30.09pie [Google Scholar]
  31. Pienemann, Manfred ; Johnston, Malcolm ; Brindley, Geoff
    (1988) Constructing an acquisition-based procedure for second language assessment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10, 217–224. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100007324
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100007324 [Google Scholar]
  32. Tarone, Elaine ; Liu, Guo-Qiang
    (1995) Situational context, variation, and second language acquisition theory. In G. Cook and B. Seidlhofer , (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H.G. Widdowson (pp. 107–124). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Yamaguchi, Yumiko
    (2009) The development of plural marking and Phrasal plural in child English L2 acquisition. In J. Kessler and D. Keatinge , (Eds.). Research in second language acquisition: Empirical evidence across languages (pp. 9–40). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhang, Yanyin
    (2004) Processing constraints, categorial analysis, and the second language acquisition of the Chinese adjective suffix –de (ADJ. Language Learning, 54, 437–468. doi: 10.1111/j.0023‑8333.2004.00261.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2004.00261.x [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.2104/aral1030
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error