1887
Volume 139, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Unlike most early second language morpheme acquisition studies which remained at a surface descriptive level, this paper provides the reasons for the natural morpheme acquisition order by characterizing morphemes based on how they are projected from the mental lexicon. Three types of morphemes are identified based on how they are activated: Morphemes directly elected at the lemma level are content morphemes, morphemes indirectly elected together with content morpheme heads are early system morphemes, and morphemes structurally assigned at the functional level are late system morphemes. It argues that the levels of morpheme activation, whether at the lemma level or at the fimctional level, determines the acquisition order. Based on the characterization of morphemes and the natural second language data, an irnplicational hierarchy of morpheme acquisition order in second language learning is proposed: content morphemes are acquired before system morphemes, and early system morphemes are acquired before late system morphemes. Unlike early second language morpheme acquisition order studies, this study not only identifies or describes the morpheme order itself but also provides some reasons for this order.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.2143/ITL.139.0.2003199
2003-01-01
2019-10-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ABNEY, S.P.
    1987 The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BAILEY, N. , C. MADDEN & S.D. KRASHEN
    1974 Is there a “natural sequence” in adult second language learning?Language Learning24:235–44.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BOCK, K. W.M. LEVELT
    1994 Language production: Grammatical encoding. In M.A. Gemsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 945–984). New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. DULAY, H.C. and M.K. BURT
    1972 Goofing: an indicator of children's second language strategies. Language Learning22:234–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. DULAY, H.C. M.K. BURT
    1973 Should we teach children syntax?Language Learning23:245–58.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. DULAY, H.C. and M.K. BURT
    1974a Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning24:37–53.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 1974b You can't learn without goofing. In J. Richards (Ed.), Error analysis: Perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 95–123). London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. DULAY, H.C. M.K. BURT
    1975 Creative construction in second language learning and teaching. In M. Burt and H. Dulay (Eds.), On TESOL =75: New directions in second language learning, teaching and bilingual education (pp. 21–32). Washington, DC: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. ELLIS, R.
    1994The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. EMONDS, J.
    1985A unified theory of syntactic categories. Dordrecht: Foris.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. FINCH, H.
    1996 Personal communication. The Statistics Laboratory at the University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.
  12. FRIEDERICI, A.D. , J. WEISSENBORN & M. KAIL
    1991 Pronoun comprehension in aphasia: A comparison of three languages. Brain and Language41:289–310.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. HATCH, E. & H. FARHADY
    1982Research design and statistics for applied linguistics. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. JAKE, J.L.
    1994 Intrasentential codes witching and pronouns: On the categorical status offunctional elements. Linguistics32:271–98.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 1998 Constructing interlanguage: Building a composite matrix language. Linguistics36:334–77.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. JAKE, J.L. and C. MYERS-SCOTTON
    1997 Relating interlanguage to codeswitching: The composite matrix language. Proceedings of Boston University Conference on Language Development319–330. Boston, MA: Cascadilla Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. JOSHI, A.
    1985 Processing of sentences with intrasentential code switching. In D.R. Dowty , L. Karttunen , and A.M. Awicky (Eds.), Natural language parsing: Psychological, computational, and theoretical perspectives (pp. 190–205). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. KLEIN, W. , R. DIETRICH & C. NOYAU
    1993 The acquisition of temporality. In C. Perdue (Ed.), Adult language acquisition: Cross-linguistic perspectives, Vol. 2 (pp. 73–118). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. KLEIN, W. & C. PERDUE
    1993 Utterance structure. In C. Perdue (Ed.), Adult language acquisition: Cross-linguistic perspectives, Vol. 2 (pp. 3–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. KLEINMANN, H.
    1977 Avoidance behavior in adult second language acquisition. Language Learning27: 93–107.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. LARSEN-FREEMAN, D.
    1975a The acquisition of grammatical morphemes by adult learners of English as a second language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
  22. 1975b The acquisition of grammatical morphemes by adult ESL students. TESOL Quarterly9:409–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. LEVELT, W.M.
    1989Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. LONG, M. and C. SATO
    1983 Classroom foreigner talk discourse: Forms and functions of teachers' questions. In H. Seliger and M. Long (Eds.), Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition (pp. 268–285). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. MYERS-SCOTTON, C.
    1993Duelling Languages: Grammatical structures in codeswitching. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 1997 Afterward. InDuelling languages: Grammatical structures in codeswitching. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. MYERS-SCOTTON, C. & J.K. JAKE
    1995 Matching lemmas in a bilingual competence and performance model: Evidence from intrasentential code switching. Linguistics33:981–1024.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 2000 Explaining aspects of codeswitching and their implications. In J. Nicol (Ed.), One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing (pp. 91–125). Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. PERDUE, C.
    (Ed.) 1993Adult language acquisition: Cross-linguistic perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. VANPATTEN, B.
    1984 Processing strategies and morpheme acquisition. In F.R. Eckman , L.H. Bell , and D. Nelson (Eds.), Universals of second language acquisition (pp. 88–98). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. 1995 Cognitive aspects of input processing in second language-acquisition. In P. Hashemipour , R. Maldonado , and M. Van Naerssen (Eds.), Studies in language learning and Spanish linguistics in honor of Tracy D. Terrell (pp. 170–83). New York: McGraw-Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. WEI, L.
    1996a. Organizational principles behind codes witching and interlanguage development in early adult second language acquisition. In J. Arnold , R. Blake , B. Davidson , S. Schwenter , and J. Solomon (Eds.), Sociolinguistic variation: Data, theory, and analysis. Selected papers from NWAV 23 (pp. 417–31). Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. WEI, L.
    1996b Variation in the acquisition of morpheme types in the interlanguage of Chinese and Japanese learners of English as a second language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.
  34. 2000 Unequal election of morphemes in adult second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics21/1: 106–140.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 2001a Lemma congruence checking between languages as an organizing principle in intrasentential code switching. International Journal of Bilingualism5/1: 153–173.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. WEI. L.
    2001b (In press) The bilingual mental lexicon and speech production process. Brain and Language.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. WHITE, L.
    1989Universal grammar and second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. 1991 Argument structure in second language acquisition. Journal of French Language Studies1 :189–207.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.2143/ITL.139.0.2003199
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error