1887
Volume 141, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.2143/ITL.141.0.2003189
2003-01-01
2025-02-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baum, S. R.
    (1993) Processing of center-embedded and right-branching relative clause sentences by normal elderly individuals. Applied PsychoLinguistics, 14, 75–88.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Gass, S.
    (1979) Language transfer and universal grammatical relations. Language Learning, 29, 327–344.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. (1980) An investigation of systematic transfer in adult second language learners. In R. C. Scarcella & S. D. Krashen (Eds.), Research in second language acquisition (pp.132–141). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hyltenstam, K.
    (1984) The use of typological markedness conditions as predictors in second language acquisition: The case of pronominal copies in relative clauses. In R. Anderson (Ed.), Second language: A cross linguistic perspective (pp.39–58). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ito, A.
    (2000) The relation between the two Noun Phrase Accessibility Hierarchies. Journal of the Hiroshima University Curriculum Research and Development Association, 15, 1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Jones, A.
    (1992) Generalization in the acquisition of relative clauses in English. Annual Report of Studies: The Faculty of Letters of Jissen Women's University, 33, 1–39.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. (1997) Aptitude: Is it relative? Annual Report of Studies: The Faculty of Letters of Jissen Women's University, 38, 59–97.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Keenan, E.
    (1975) Variation in universal grammar. In E. Fasold & R. Shuy (Eds.), Analyzing variation in language (pp.136–149). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Keenan, E. L. & B. Comrie
    (1977) Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. linguistic Inquiry, 8, 63–99.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kuno, S.
    (1974) The position of relative clause and cognition.Linguistic Inquiry, 5, 117–136.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Larson, R.
    (1988) On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry, 19, 335–391.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Ohba, H.
    (1995) The learning order of English relative clauses by Japanese senior high school students in an instruction-only environment. Journal of Health Sciences University of Hokkaido, 21, 19–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Prideaux, G. D.
    (1984) PsychoLinguistics: the experimental study of language. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. (1987) Strategies and structures: the processing of relative clauses. London: John Benjamins
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Quirk, R. , Greenbaum., Leech, G. , & Svartvik, J.
    (1985) A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Sheldon, A.
    (1974) The role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 3, 272–281.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Shumann, J. H.
    (1980) Acquisition of English relative clauses by second language learners. In R. Scarcella & S. Krashen (Eds.), Research in second language acquisition (pp.119–131). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Slobin, D. I.
    (1973) Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In C. A. Furgason & D. Slobin (Eds.), Studies of child language development (pp.175–208). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Yamashita, J.
    (1994) An analysis of relative clauses in the Lancaster/IBM spoken English corpus. English Studies, 75, 73–84.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.2143/ITL.141.0.2003189
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error