1887
Volume 147, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

A variety of studies have reported that the order of Noun Phrase Accessibility Hierarchy can be a valid predictor of difficulty of relative clauses, but it is unclear whether the difficulty of relative clauses should be attributed to the grammatical function of noun phrases (grammatical relation) or to configurational differences in the relative clause structure. A few articles have reported that learners of English are more sensitive to configurational distinctions than grammatical relation distinctions in relative clause production. However, not much research on this issue has been conducted. The results of a grammaticality judgment test conducted with 77 Japanese learners of English point toward a stronger sensitivity to configuration than to grammatical relation, favoring the configurational account.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.2143/ITL.148.0.2002064
2004-01-01
2019-10-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ART, F. ,& SCHILS, E.
    (1995) Relative clauses, the accessibility hierarchy and the contrastive analysis hypothesis. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 33,47–63.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BARDOVI-HARLlG, K.
    (1987) Markedness and salience in second-language acquisition. Language Learning, 37,385–470.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BERENT, G.
    (1994) The subset principle in second language acquisition. In Cohen, A. , S. Gass and E. Tarone (Eds.), Research methodology in secondlanguage acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 17–40
    [Google Scholar]
  4. ECKMAN, F. , BELL, L. , & NELSON, D.
    (1988) On the generalization of relative clause instruction in the acquisition of English as a second language. Applied Linguistics, 9, 1–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. GASS, S.
    (1979) Language transfer and universal grammatical relations. Language Learning, 29, 327–344.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. (1980) An investigation of systematic transfer in adult second language learners. In R. C. Scarcella & S. D. Krashen (Eds.), Research in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 132–141.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gass, S.
    (1982) From theory to practice. In M. Hines & W. Rutherford (Eds.), On TESOL '81. Washington, D.C.: TESOL, 129–139.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. GOODLUCK, H. , & STOJANOVIC, D.
    (1996) The structure and acquisition of relative clauses in Serbo-Croatian. Language Acquisition, 5, 285–315.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. HAMILTON, R. L.
    (1994) Is implicational generalization unidirectional and maximal? Evidence from relativization instruction in a second language. Language Learning, 44, 123–157.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. (1995) The Noun Phrase Accessibility Hierarchy in SLA: Determining the basis for its developmental effects. In F.R. Eckman , D. Highland , P.W. Lee , J. Mileham , & R.R. Weber (Eds.), Second language acquisition: Theory and pedagogy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 101–114.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. ITO, A
    (1995) An investigation of the influential factors on the difficulty of the unit 'whose + NP.'Annals of Educational Research, 43, 67-72.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. ITO, A.
    (2001) Japanese EFL learners' sensitivity to configurational distinction in English relativization. Review of Applied Linguistics, 131 & 132, 11–33.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. KEENAN, E.
    (1975) Variation in universal grammar. In E. Fasold & R. Shuy (Eds.), Analyzing variation in language. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 136–149.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. KEENAN, E. , & COMRIE, B.
    (1977) Noun Phrase Accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 63–99.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. MATSUNAMI, Y. , Y. IKEGAMI ., & K. IMAI
    (Eds.) (1983) Taishukan dictionary for English studies. Tokyo: Taishukan Shoten.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. MAZURKEWICH, I.
    (1984) The acquisition of the dative alteration by second language learners and linguistic theory. Language Learning, 34, 91–109.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. OHBA, H.
    (1995) The learning order of English relative clauses by Japanese senior high school students in an instruction-only environment. Journal of Health Sciences University of Hokkaido, 21, 19–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. PARK, S. , & LEE, S.
    (2001) Corpus analysis of preposition stranding and piedpiping: Does frequency-based input theory account for the L2 acquisition order of PS and PP? Proceeding of the Third Annual Conference of the Japanese Society for Language Sciences, 103–108.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. PINKER, S.
    (1989) Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. SADIGHI, F.
    (1994) The acquisition of English relative clauses by Chinese, Japanese and Korean adult native speakers. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 141–153.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. WHITE, L.
    (1987) Markedness and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 261–285.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. WOLFE-QUINTERO, K.
    (1992) Learnability and the acquisition of extraction in relative clauses and wh-questions. Studies in Second LanguageAcquisition, 14, 39–70.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.2143/ITL.148.0.2002064
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error