1887
Volume 149, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Review of Rudzka-Ostyn, Brygida (2003), Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/itl.149-150.05der-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.2143/ITL.150.0.2004374
2005-01-01
2019-09-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Achard, M. & S. Niemeier
    (ds.)(2004) Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Biber, D. , S. Johansson , G. Leech , S. Conrad & E. Finnegan
    (1999) Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow, Essex: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Boers, F. & M. Demecheleer
    (1998) A cognitive semantic approach to teaching prepositions. English Language Teaching Journal52:3.197–204.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Capel, A.
    (1993) Prepositions. London: HarperCollins.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chiavarini, D.
    (1993) Summary of preposition query. Linguist List 4.677linguistlist.org/ issues/4/4-677.html [Accessed13 September 2004]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen, L.
    (2004) Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teachingby M. Achard & S. Niemeier (ds.)(2004) [Book Review] LINGUIST List 15.1868 www.sfs.nphil.uni-tuebingen.de/linguist/issues/15/15-4868.html [Accessed25 January 2005]
  7. Cook, G.
    (2000) Language learning, language play. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dirven, R.
    (2001) English phrasal verbs: Theory and didactic application. In M. Pütz , S. Niemeier & R. Dirven (ds.), Applied cognitive linguistics II: Language pedagogy. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 3–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Garrod, S. , G. Ferrier & S. Campbell
    (1999) In and on: Investigating the functional geometry of spatial prepositions. Cognition72.167–189.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Harmer, J.
    (2001) The practice of English language teaching. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. KlM, Y. & P. Winke
    (2001) A cognitive approach to teaching English prepositions. epsilon3.georgetown.edu/-pmw2/papers/Yiyoung&Paula’sFinalPaperCogLing12.21.21.html [Accessed13 September 2004]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Lewis, M.
    (1993) The lexical approach: The state of ELT and a way forward. Hove, UK: Language Teaching Publications.
  13. (1997) Implementing the lexical approach: Putting theory into practice. Hove, UK: Language Teaching Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Lindstromberg, S.
    (1996) English prepositions: Meaning and method. English Language Teaching Journal50:3.225–236.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. (1998) English prepositions explained. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. (2001) (Sometimes) Against the grain. Humanising Language Teaching3:3.1-5. www.hltmag.co.uk/may01/lind.htm [Accessed13 September 2004]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Rudzka-Ostyn, B.
    (d.)(1988) Topics in cognitive linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Sandra, D. & S. Rice
    (1995) Network analyses of prepositional meaning: Mirroring whose mind - the linguist’s or the language user’s?Cognitive Linguistics6:1.89–130.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Schmitt, N & D. Schmitt
    (1995) Vocabulary notebooks: Theoretical underpinnings and practical suggestions. English Language Teaching Journal49:2.133–143.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Scurfield, S.
    (2003) Give vocabulary learning a chance. TESOL Spain Newsletter 2003 <www.tesol-spain.org/newsletter/scurfield.html [Accessed27 January 2005]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. (2004) Vocabulary teaching and acquisition: Still in the DarkAges?In A. Pulverness (d.) lATEFL 38th international annual conference Brighton, 13-17 April 2004. Canterbury, Kent: lATEFL, 50–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Truss, L.
    (2003) Ears, shoots & leaves: The zero tolerance approach to punctuation. London: Profile Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Tyler, A. & V. Evans
    (2003) The semantics of English prepositions: Spatial sciences, embodied meaning, and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. (2004) Applying cognitive linguistics to pedagogical grammar: The case of over. In M. Achard & S. Niemeier (ds.), 257–280.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Winke, P. & Y. Kim
    (2002) It’s not over with over. Cognitive approaches to teaching prepositions. Poster presentation held at the Second Language Research Forum, University of Toronto, Canada (5 October 2002).
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.2143/ITL.150.0.2004374
Loading
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error