1887
Volume 151, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This study investigated the extent to which adjunct language instruction (ALI) is effective and the reasons for its effectiveness through an analysis of the perceptions of students. The beneficial effects of teaching lab report writing in English by instruction in content-based writing using genre-based materials from a concurrent physics course were confirmed by a comparison of two groups of Malay-speaking engineering students in a Malaysian university. The primary focus of the study was, however, concerned with identifying the factors that contribute to this effectiveness using structural equation modelling (SEM) as an analytical tool. Two hundred and sixty students in ten groups were instructed, also using ALI materials and asked to complete a questionnaire. Answers were then used to construct a model of the effectiveness of ALI. It was found that the type of writing instruction needed by engineering students was instruction in lab report writing and that ALI lab report instruction led to an improvement in the students' report writing. The model developed through SEM indicated that ALI provided three factors or conditions necessary for its success: the method of teaching lab report writing, the students' acceptance of the materials, and the match between the instruction and the students'linguistic proficiency.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.2143/ITL.151.0.2015222
2006-01-01
2019-12-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Benesch, S.
    (1988) Ending Remediation: Linking ESL And Content In Higher Education. Washington, DC: TESOL.
  2. Blass, L. and Pike, P.B.
    (1996) Mosaic 11: A content-based writing book. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  3. Bollen, K. A.
    (1989) Structural Equations With Latent Variables. New York: Wiley.
  4. Brinton, D. , Snow, M. and Masters, P.
    (Eds.) (1997) New Ways in Content-based Instruction. Alexandria: TESOL.
  5. Brinton, D. , Snow, M. and Wesche, M. B.
    (1989) Content-Based Second Language Instruction. Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
  6. Baumgardner, J. C.
    (1996) Helping Students Learn To Write: An Idea Book For K-7 Teachers. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  7. Cox, C.
    (1996) Teaching Language Arts (2nd ed). Needham Heights: Simon and Schuster.
  8. Diamantopoulos, A. and Siguaw, J. A.
    (2000) Introducing LISREL. London: SAGE.
  9. Gaffield-vile, N.
    (1996) Content-based learning in second language instruction at the tertiary level. ELT Journal50/2, 108-114.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gass, S. , Svetics, I. and Lemelin, S.
    (2003) Differential effects of attention. Learning Language53/3, 497-545.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gillespie, D. F. , Alsup, R. and Rubio, D. M.
    (1995) Structural equation modelling: An innovation for doctoral social work curricula. Journal of Social Work Education31, 219-227.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Grabe, W. and Kaplan, R.B.
    (1998) Theory And Practice Of Writing. London: Longman.
  13. Halliday, D. , Resnick, R. and Walker, J.
    (1997) Fundamentals of Physics: Extended (5th ed). New York: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hedge, T.
    (2000) Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. Oxford; Oxford University Press.
  15. Henia, N. D.
    (1999) Improving science students' fluency through project work. The Internet TESL Journal, 5/8. AccessedJan 16, 1999h.ac.jp/Hteslj/Techniques/Dhieb-Science Projects/index.html
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hoyle, R. H.
    (Ed.) (1995) Structural Equation Modelling: Concepts, Issues, And Applications. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
  17. Jenkins, M.
    (1986) Writing: A Content Approach to ESL Composition. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
  18. Jensen, A. R.
    (1998) The g Factor: The Science of Mental Ability. Westport: Praeger.
  19. Kasper, L. F.
    (1994) Improved reading performance for ESL students through academic course pairing. Journal of Reading37, 376-84.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. (1995) Discipline-orientated ESL reading instruction. Teaching English in the Two-Year College22, 45–53.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. (1997) The impact of content-based instructional programs on the academic progress of ESL students. English for Specific Purposes16/4, 309-320.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Krashen, S. D.
    (1982) Principles And PracticeInSecond Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.
  23. Language centre, UiTM
    Language centre, UiTM (2000) Mainstream English 1: A Basic Course For MUET. Shah Alam: Pearson Education Malaysia.
  24. Mcmahan, E. and Funk, R.
    (2002) Here's How To Write Well. New York: Longman.
  25. Painter, C.
    (2001) Understanding genre and register: Implications for language teaching. In Burns, A. and Coffin, C (Ed.). Analyzing English In A Global Context. New York: Routledge.
  26. Pincas, A.
    (1989) Teaching English Writing. London: MacMillan.
  27. Rubin, D.
    (1995) Teaching Elementary Language Arts: An Integrated Approach. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  28. Short, D.
    (1991) Integrating language and content instruction: Strategies and Techniques. InNCBE Program Information Guide Series, 7. AccessedFeb 17, 1999www.ncbe. gwu.edu/ncbepnbs/pigs/pig7.htm
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Smith, N.
    (1993) Writing Your Life Story: A Step-By-Step Guide To Writing Your Autobiography. London: Piatkus.
  30. Snow, M.A.
    (2001) Content-based and immersion models for second and foreign language teaching. InTeaching English As A Second Or Foreign Language (3rd ed). Celce-Murcia M. ,(Ed.). 303-318.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Snow, M.A. and Brinton, D.M.
    (1988) Content based instruction: Investigating the effectiveness of adjunct model. Tesol Quarterly22/4, 553-574.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Snow, M. A. , Padilla, A. M. and Campbell, R. M.
    (1988) Pattern of second language retention of graduates of a Spanish immersion program. Applied Linguistics, 9/2, 182-217.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Sofia, R. H.
    (1991) English for Specific Purposes: Economics. Jakarta: Gramedia.
  34. Stine, J. M.
    (2000) Super Brain Power: 6 Keys To Unlocking Your Hidden Genius. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  35. Tabachnick, B. G and Fidell, L. S.
    (1996) Using Multivariate Statistics (3rd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
  36. Tudor, I.
    (1993) Teacher roles in the learner-centred classroom. ELT Journal47/1, 22-30.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Ullman, J. B.
    (1996) Structural equation modelling. In Tabachnick, B. G and Fidell, L. S. Using Multivariate Statistics (3rd ed). New York: Harper Collins..
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.2143/ITL.151.0.2015222
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error