1887
Volume 152, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This article argues that the construct of task can provide a principled and effective foundation for the development of extended, multi-year curricula and pedagogies for second/foreign language learning of adults. That assertion is made with an important condition: "task" must be expanded, both theoretically and empirically, toward issues that arise in conjunction with textuality and literacy rather than being grounded primarily in psycho linguistic, sentence-oriented processing considerations, as original proposals by Long and Crookes (1992) had suggested.

The article presents that overall theoretical argument and then describes how genre-based tasks have been used (1) for selection and sequencing decisions within an existing contentoriented collegiate curriculum in the German Department at Georgetown University; (2) as a way to inform pedagogical choices that target advanced levels of L2 ability, particularly the crucial area of vocabulary development; and (3) to devise genre-based tasks that assess L2 learners' language abilities and content knowledge across the curriculum and also help to further specify learning objectives and curricular choices.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.2143/ITL.152.0.2017864
2006-01-01
2019-10-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bakhtin, M. M.
    (1981) Discourse in the novel. In M. Holquist (ed.), translated by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist , The dialogic imagination (pp.259–422). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. (1986) The problem of speech genres. In C. Emerson , & M. Holquist (Eds.), Speech genres and other late essays (pp.60-102). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bhatia, V. K.
    (2002) A generic view of academic discourse. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp.21-39). Harlow, England: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bygate, M. , & Samuda, V.
    (2005) Integrative planning through the use of task-repetition. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp.37-74). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bygate, M. , Skehan, P. , & Swain, M.
    (2001) Introduction. In M. Bygate , P. Skehan , & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp.1-20). Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Byrnes, H.
    (1998) Constructing curricula in collegiate foreign language departments. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Learning foreign and second languages: Perspectives in research and scholarship (pp.262-295). New York: MLA.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. (2002) The role of task and task-based assessment in a content-oriented collegiate FL curriculum. Language Testing, 19,419-437.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. (2004) Advanced L2 literacy: Beyond option or privilege. ADFL Bulletin, 36(1), 52-60.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. (2006a) A semiotic perspective on culture and foreign language teaching: Implications for collegiate materials development. In V. Galloway , & B. Cothran (Eds.), Language and culture out of bounds: Discipline-blurred perspectives on the foreign language classroom (pp.37-66). Boston, MA: Heinle Thomson.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. (2006b) Perspectives: Interrogating communicative competence as a framework for collegiate foreign language study. Modern Language Journal, 90(2), 244-266.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Byrnes, H. , & Sprang, K.A.
    (2004) Fostering advanced L2 literacy: A genre-based, cognitive approach. In H. Byrnes , & H. H. Maxim (Eds.), Advanced foreign language learning: A challenge to college programs (pp.47-85). Boston, MA: Heinle Thomson.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Cope, B. , & Kalantzis, M.
    (Eds.) (1993) The powers of literacy: A genre approach to teaching writing. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Crane, C. , Liamkina, 0. , & Ryshina-Pankova, M.
    (2004) Three papers delivered in the colloquium "Expanding notions of explicit instruction: The potential of genre-based tasks," American Association for Applied Linguistics (MAL), Portland, OR, May 3, 2004.
  14. Developing multiple literacies
    Developing multiple literacies: A curriculum renewal project of the German Department at Georgetown University, 1997-2000. (2000) www3.georgetown.edu/departments/german/programs/curriculum/index.html.
  15. Ellis, N.
    (2005) At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 305-352.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Elfis, R.
    (2003) Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gee, ,J. P.
    (1998) What is literacy? In V. Zamel , & R. Spack (Eds.), Negotiating academic literacies: Teaching and learning across languages and cultures (pp.51-59). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gee, J. P.
    (2002) Literacies, identities, and discourses. In M. J. Schleppegrell , & M. Cecilia Colombi (Eds.), Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages: Meaning with power (pp.159-175). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Greene, S.
    (1992) Mining texts in reading to write. Journal of Advanced Composition, 12, 151-170.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Halliday, M. A. K.
    (1974) The place of "functional sentence perspective" in the system of linguistic description. In F. Danes (Ed.), Papers on functional sentence perspective ( Janua Linguarum, Ser. Minor 147) (pp.43-53). Prague: Academia.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. (1993) Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5(2), 93-116.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. (1994, 2nd ed.). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Halliday, M. A. K. , & Martin, J. R.
    (1993) Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. LondonlWashington: Falmer Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hasan, R.
    (1995) The conception of context in text. In P. H. Fries , & M. Gregory (Eds.), Discourse in society: Systemic functional perspectives: Meaning and choice in language: Studies for Michael Halliday (pp.183-283). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. (1996) Speech genre, semiotic mediation and the development of higher mental functions. In C. Cloran , D. Butt , & G. Williams (Eds.), Ways of saying: Ways of meaning: Selected papers of Ruqaiya Hasan (pp.152-190). London: Cassell.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Henriksen, B.
    (1999) Three dimensions of vocabulary development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 303-317.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Holquist, M.
    (1981) The politics of representation. In S. J. Greenblatt (Ed.), Allegory and representation: Selected papers from the English Institute, 1979-80 (pp.163-183). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hymes, D.
    (1972) On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride , & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics. Selected readings (pp.269-283). Baltimore: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Joe, A.
    (1998) What effect do text-based tasks promoting generation have on incidental vocabulary acquisition? Applied Linguistics, 19,357-377.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Johnson, K.
    (1982) Communicative syllabus design and methodology. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  31. Labov, w. , & Waletzky, J.
    (1997) Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1-4),3-38.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Long, M. H.
    (1994) On the advocacy of the task-based syllabus. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 782-790.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Long, M. H. , & Crookes, G.
    (1992) Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 27-56.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. (1993) Units of analysis in syllabus design: The case for task. In G. Crookes , & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks in a pedagogical context: Integrating theory and practice (pp.9-54). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Martin, J. R.
    (1985) Process and text: Two aspects of human semiosis. In J. D. Benson , & W. S. Greaves (Eds.), SystemiC perspectives on discourse (pp.243-274). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Matthiessen, C.
    (1993) Register in the round: Diversity in a unified theory of register analysis. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Register analysis: Theory and practice (pp.221–292). London: Pinter.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.
    (2006) Educating for advanced foreign language capacities: Exploring the meaning-making resources of languages systemically. Unpublished manuscript.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Maxim, H. H.
    (2004) Expanding visions for collegiate advanced foreign language learning. In H. Byrnes , & H. H. Maxim (Eds.), Advanced foreign language learning: A challenge to college programs (pp.180–193). Boston, MA: Heinle Thomson.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Melka, F.
    (1997) Receptive vs. productive aspects of vocabulary. In N. Schmitt , & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp.84–102). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Norris, J. M.
    (2005) The essential roles of assessment, measurement, and evaluation in taskbased language teaching. Plenary address presented at theFirst International Conference on Task-based Language Teaching, University of Leuven, Belgium (Sept. 23, 2005). Retrieved fromwww2.hawaii.edu/-jnorrisITBLT%20presentation.ppt.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. (2006) Assessing advanced foreign language learning and learners: From measurement constructs to educational uses. In H. Byrnes , H. Weger-Guntharp , & K. A. Sprang (Eds.), Educating for advanced foreign language capacities: Constructs, curriculum, instruction, assessment. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 167–187.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Ortega, L.
    (2005) For what and for whom is our research? The ethical as transformative lens in instructed SLA. Modern Language Journal, 89, 427–443.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Paribakht, T. S. , & Wesche, M.
    (2006) Lexical inferencing in L 1 and L2: Implications for vocabulary instruction and learning at advanced levels. In H. Byrnes , H. Weger-Guntharp , & K. A. Sprang (Eds.), Educating for advanced foreign language capacities: Constructs, curriculum, instruction, assessment. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 118–135.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Ryshina-Pankova, M.
    (2006) Construction of coherent discourse in written texts by American learners of German: Towards attainment of advanced levels of literacy in a foreign language. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Georgetown University, Wachington , DC.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Schleppegrell, M. J.
    (2004) The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Schwanenftugel, P. , & Akin, C.
    (1994) Developmental trends in lexical decisions for abstract and concrete words. Reading Research Quarterly, 29, 251–264.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Skehan, P.
    (1998) A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Sprang, K.A.
    (2003) Vocabulary acquisition and advanced learners: The role ofgrammaticization and conceptual organization in the acquisition of German verbs with inseparable prefixes. Unpublished PhD. dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Stenhouse, L.
    (1975) An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Wertsch, J. V.
    (2006) Generalized collective dialogue and advanced foreign language capacities. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky. London: Continuum, 59–72.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Wesche, M. B. , & Skehan, P.
    (2002) Communicative, task-based, and content-based language instruction. In R. B. Kaplan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of applied linguistics (pp.207–228). New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.2143/ITL.152.0.2017864
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error