Review of Godijns, R. & M. Hinderdael, eds (2005) Directionality in Interpreting: The 'Retour' or The Native? Communication & Cognition

References

1. Chernov, Ghelly V.
   (1999), “Conference interpreting in Russia”, Interpreting4,1,41–54
   [Google Scholar]
2. Chesterman, Andrew
   (2000), Mernes of translation. The spread of ideas in translation theory, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins
   [Google Scholar]
3. Guiora, Alexander, Z. , B. Beit-Hallahmi , R.C.M. Brannon , C.Y. Dull & T. S. Scovel
   (1972), “The effects of experimentally induced changes in ego states on pronunciation ability in a second language: an exploratory study”, Comprehensive Psychiatry13,5,421–428
   [Google Scholar]
4. Liu, Minhua , Diane L. Schallert & Patrick J. Carroll
   (2004), “Working memory and expertise in simultaneous interpreting”, Interpreting6,1,19–42
   [Google Scholar]
5. Moser, Peter
   (1996), “Expectations of users of conference interpretation”, Interpreting1,2, 145–178
   [Google Scholar]
6. Seleskovitch, Danica & Marianne Lederer
   (2002), Pédagogie raisonnée de l'interprétation, Paris: OPOCE & Didier Érudition (2e édition corrigée et augmentée)
   [Google Scholar]
7. Tommola, Jorma & Marketta Helevä
   (1998), “Language direction and source text complexity. Effects on trainee performance in simultaneous interpreting” in Lynne Bowker , Michael Cronin , Dorothy Kenny & Jennifer Pearson (eds.), Unity in diversity? Current trends in translation studies, Manchester: St. Jerome, pp.177–186
   [Google Scholar]
8. Van Besien, Fred
   (1999), “Anticipation in simultaneous interpretation”, Mefa44,2,250–259
   [Google Scholar]
9. Van Besien, Fred & Chris Meuleman
   , “Dealing with speakers' errors and speakers' repairs in simultaneous interpretation. A corpus based study”, The Translator10,1(2004), 59–81
   [Google Scholar]
10. Van Besien, Fred & Chris Meuleman
    (submitted), “Style differences among simultaneous interpreters: a pilot study”
    [Google Scholar]