Volume 156, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



Global simulation is described as “simultaneously an approach, a set of classroom techniques, and the conceptual framework for a syllabus” (Levine, 2004, p. 27). Students create a fictive yet culturally grounded world, assume the role of a self-developed character, and collaborate with fellow community members (Magnin, 1997). Despite its numerous cited advantages, there are no known empirical studies evaluating the influence of global simulation on language learners. This study evaluated how global simulation influenced the development of intermediate-French students’ writing self-beliefs and text quality. Significant differences were found in Intermediate French students’ writing self-efficacy, writing self-concept, writing anxiety, and text quality in organization, content, and creativity after participation in a global simulation curriculum. No significant differences were found in students’ self-efficacy for self-regulation, perceived value of writing, or text quality in grammar and expression. Implications for researchers and educators are discussed.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Bandura, A.
    (1986) Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  2. (1995) Manual for the construction of self-efficacy scales. Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-2130.
  3. (1997) Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
  4. Betz, N. E.
    (1978) Prevalence, distribution, and correlates of math anxiety in college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 25, 441–448.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bruning, R., & Horn, C.
    (2000) Developing motivation to write. Educational Psychologist, 35, 25–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Campbell, C.
    (1998) Teaching second-language writing: Interacting with text. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
  7. Caré, J.M.
    (1995) Inventer pour apprendre: Les simulations globales. Die neuerenSprachen, 94 (1), 69–87.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cheng, Y. S.
    (2002) Factors associated with foreign language writing. Foreign Language Annals, 35, 647–656.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cheval, M.
    (1995) Simulation globale et apprentissages surobjectifs spécifiques. Le Français dans le Monde, Special Number, 124–7.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cohen, J.
    (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  11. Cohen, M., & Riel, M.
    (1989) The effect of distant audiences on student writing. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 143–159.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Collins, S. J., & Bissell, K. L.
    (2002) Self-efficacy in a media writing course. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator, 56, 19–36.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Debyser, F.
    (1996) L’immeuble. Paris: Hachette. Debyser, F (1999) L’art pédagogique de la simulation. RetrievedApril 19, 2007fromwww.missionlaique.asso.fr/pedagogie/pdf/franc36/cf36p63.pdf
  14. Dupuy, B.
    (2006a) “L’Immeuble”: French language and culture teaching and learning through projects in a global simulation. InJ. Hammadou-Sullivan (Ed.), Project-based Learning in Second Language Education: Past, Present and Future, Research in Second Language Learning.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Greenwich
    , CT: Information Age Publishing. Dupuy, B. (2006b) Global simulation: Experiential learning and preparing students at home for study abroad. InS. Wilkinson (Ed.), Insights from Study Abroad for Language Programs (pp.99–115). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Eccles, J. P.
    (1984) Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. InJ.T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and Achievement Motives (pp.75–146). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gamson, W. A.
    (1991) Commitment and agency in social movements. Sociological Forum, 6, 27–50.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. García-Carbonell, A., Rising, B., Montero, B., & Watts, F.
    (2001) Simulation/gaming and the acquisition of communicative competence in another language. Simulation and Gaming, 32 (4), 481–91.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Greenia, G.
    (1992) Computers and teaching composition in a foreign language. Foreign Language Annals, 25, 33–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Gungle, B.W., & Taylor, V.
    (1989) Writing apprehension and second language writers. InEds., D. M. Johnson & D. H. Roen (Eds.), Richness in writing: Empowering ESL students. New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Harlow, L. L., & Muyskens, J.
    (1994) Priorities for intermediate-level language instruction. Modern Language Journal, 78, 141–154.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Henning, S. D.
    (2002, Winter). Relating Literature to Culture: Putting Theory into Practice at the Intermediate Level. ERIC, ED 462 866, FL 027 207. Microform.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Holm, S.
    (1979) A simple sequential rejective multiple test procedure. Scandanavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65–70.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Ivanic, R., & Camps, D.
    (2001) I am how I sound: Voice as self-representation in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 3–33.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Jones, K.
    (1984) Simulations in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  26. Juraseck, R.
    (1996) Intermediate-level foreign language curricula: An assessment and new agenda. ADFL Bulletin, 27, 18–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kern, R., & Schultz, J. M.
    (1992) The effects of composition instruction on intermediate level French students’ writing performance: Some preliminary findings. The Modern Language Journal, 76, 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kovalik, D. L., & Kovalik, L. M.
    (2002) Language learning simulations: A Piagetian perspective. Simulation and Gaming, 33(3), 345–352.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Levine, G.
    (2004) Global simulation: A student-centered, task-based format for intermediate Foreign Language courses. Foreign Language Annals, 37, 26–36.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Magnin, M. C.
    (1997) The building: An adaptation of Francis Debyser’s writing project. A global simulation to teach language and culture. In China-U.S. conference on education. Collected papers (pp.55–62).
    [Google Scholar]
  31. (2002) An interdisciplinary approach to teaching foreign languages with global and functional simulations. Simulation and Gaming, 33(3), 395–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Marsh, H. W.
    (1990) The structure of academic self-concept: The Marsh- Shavelson Model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 623–636.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Masny, D., & Foxall, J.
    (1992) Writing apprehension in L2. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 020 882).
    [Google Scholar]
  34. McCarthy, P., Meier, S., & Rindere, R.
    (1985) Self-efficacy and writing. College Composition and Communication, 36, 465–471.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. McConochie, J.
    (2000) Feeling and acting like a writer. TESOL Journal, 9, 4.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Mills, N. A., Pajares, F., and Herron, C. A.
    (2006) A reevaluation of the role of anxiety: Self-efficacy, anxiety, and their relation to reading and listening proficiency. Foreign Language Annals, 39, 273–292.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Omaggio, A. H.
    (2000) Teaching language in context. Heinle & Heinle: Boston.
  38. Pajares, F.
    (1995, April) Assessing self-efficacy beliefs and academic outcomes: The case for specificity and correspondence. InB. J. Zimmerman (Chair), Measuring and mismeasuring self-efficacy: Dimensions, problems, and misconceptions. Paper presented at asymposium conducted at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. (2002) Gender and perceived self-efficacy in self-regulated learning. Theory into Practice, 41, 116–125.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. (2003) Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19, 139–158.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Pajares, M. F., & Johnson, M. J.
    (1993, April) Confidence and competence in writing:The role of self-efficacy, outcome expectancy, and apprehension. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA, April 12-16, 1993). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 358 474).
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Pajares, F., & Johnson, M. J.
    (1994) Self-efficacy beliefs and the writing performance of entering high school students. Psychology in the Schools, 33, 163–175.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Pajares, F, Miller, M. D.
    (1995) Mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics outcomes: The need for specificity of assessment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 190–198.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Pajares, F., & Valiante, G.
    (1999) Grade level and gender differences in the writing self-beliefs of middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 390–405.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Pavlenko, A., & Lantolf, J.
    (2000) Second language learning as participation and the (re)construction of selves. InJ.P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory of second language learning (pp.155–178). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Schunk, D. H.
    (1995) Self-efficacy and education and instruction. InJ. E. Maddux (Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application (pp.281–303). New York: Plenum Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Shell, D. F., Colvin, C., & Bruning, R. H.
    (1995) Self-efficacy, attributions, and outcome expectancy mechanisms in reading and writing achievement: Grade-level and achievement-level differences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 386–398.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Snow, D.
    (2001) Collective identity and expressive forms. In the e-scholarship repository, University of California, repositories.cdlib.org/csd/01-07.
  49. Spaulding, C.
    (1995) Teachers’ psychological presence on students’ writing-task engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 88, 210–219.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Spiliotopoulos, V., & Carey, S.
    (2005) Investigating the role of identity in writing using electronic bulletin boards. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 62, 87–109.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Tang, R., & Suganthi, R.
    (1999) The ‘I’ in identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first person pronoun. English for Specific Purposes, 18, S23–S39.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Wachholz, P. B., & Etheridge, C. P.
    (1996) Speaking for themselves: Writing self-efficacy beliefs of high and low apprehensive writers. Collected EDRS papers (pp.2–20).
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Walker, B. J.
    (2003) The cultivation of student self-efficacy in reading and writing. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19, 173–187.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Wigfield, A., Eccles, J., MacIver, D., Reuman, D., & Midgley, C.
    (1991) Transitions at early adolescence: Changes in children’s domain-specific self-perceptions and general self-esteem across the transition to junior high school. Developmental Psychology, 27, 552–565.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Yaiche, F.
    (1998) Construire et simuler avec les apprenants. [Constructing and simulating with students]. NeusprachlicheMitteilungen aus Wissenschaft und Praxis, 51(4) 227–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Zimmerman, B.J, & Bandura, A.
    (1994) Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing course attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 3, 845–862.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Zuckerman, M. B.
    (2003) America’s Best Colleges: 2003 Edition. Washington DC: US News & World Report.
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error