1887
Volume 157, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The view that explicit instruction of metacognitive strategies is important for raising reader consciousness has become prominent recently. This study was an attempt to determine the impacts of instructing metacognitive strategies on readers’ comprehension. Two groups of students majoring in English language at Shiraz University/ Iran were compared using Schraw & Denisson’s (1994) “Metacognitive Awareness Inventory” to find out the participants’ degree of awareness towards metacognitive strategies. After a period of four months of pretest- treatment–posttest design, the results revealed a significant improvement in the experimental group who were trained to use metacognitive strategies consciously in their reading tasks as compared with the control group. The pedagogical implications of the study are also discussed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.2143/ITL.157.0.2042588
2009-01-01
2019-11-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alexander, P.A. & Jelton, T.A.
    (2000) Learning from text: A multidimensional and developmental perspective. InM. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson & R. Barr(Eds.)Handbook of Reading Research: Designing Research-based Programs. (vol. 3, pp. 285–310). NY: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, N.J.
    (1991) Individual differences in strategy use in second language reading and testing. Modern Language Journal, 75, 460–472.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Andesron, N.J.
    (2002) The Role of Metacognition in Second Language Teaching and Learning. ERIC Digest, April 2002, Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Block, E.
    (1986) The comprehension strategies of second language readers. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 463–491.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Carol, R.
    (2002) Mindful reading: strategy training that facilitates transfer. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 45(6), 498–513.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Carrell, P.L.
    (1989) Metacognitive awareness and second language reading. Modern Language Journal, 73, 123–134.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Carrell, P.L., Pharis B.G. & Liberto, J.G.
    (1989) Metacognitive strategy training for ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 2(4), 647–678.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chamot, A.U.
    (2005a) The cognitive academic language learning approach (CALLA): An updateInP.A. Richard-Amato & M.A. Snow(Eds.). Academic Success for English Language Learners: Strategies for K-12 Mainstream Researchers (pp. 87–101). NY: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. (2005b) Language learning strategies instruction: Current issues and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 112–130.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Dhieb-Henia, N.
    (2003) Evaluating the effectiveness of metacognitive strategy training for reading research articles in an ESP context. English for Specific Purposes, 22, 387–417.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Duke, N.K.
    (2004) Strategies for Addressing Comprehension Difficulties. Presentation at Reading Research 2004, International Reading Association, Reoro, Nevada.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Ellis, R.
    (1994) The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (2002) Methodological options in grammar teaching material. InE. Hi & S. Fotos(Eds.), New Perspectives on Grammar Teaching in 2nd Language Classrooms (pp. 155–179). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associations.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Flavel, R.
    (1979) Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive development inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Fotovatian, S. & Shokrpour, N.
    (2007) Comparison of the efficacy of reading comprehension strategies on Iranian university students. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 37(2), 47–63.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gleber, C.
    (2008) The Effects of Metacognitive Training on Performance in Self-directed Learning Situations. RetrievedOctober 5, 2008, fromhttp//:www.Conrad Gleber.com/html/intrometacognition.html.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Goh, C.M.
    (1998) Strategic processing and metacognition in 2nd language listening. RELC Journal, 29 (2), 173–75.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Haynie, J.M., Gregori, D.& Shepherd, D.A.
    (2004) Informing Entrepreneurial Cognition: The Role of Metacognitive and Analogical Training in strategic Decision Making. RetrievedOctober 20, 2008, fromwww.babson.edu/entrep/fer/fer-2004/web-content/section20/xxii/p1/xxii-p1-text.html.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Macedo, A.R.
    (1999) Pedagogic grammar and second language acquisition. Module 2, printed in the university of Birmingham, TESL/TEFL MA program.
  20. Magno, C.
    (2008) Reading strategy, amount of writing, metacognition, metamemory and apprehension as predictors of English written proficiency. Asian EFL Journal, 29, 1–8.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Marzban, A.
    (2006, April) The Interdependence between the Process and the Product of Reading in English and Persian. A paper presented atLSP international conference, Johor, Malaysia.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Mokhtari, K. & Richard, C.P.
    (2002) Assessing students’ metacognition awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249–259.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. National Capital Language Research Center (NCLRC)
    National Capital Language Research Center (NCLRC) (2003) Elementary Immersion Learning Strategies Resource Guide. Washington, DC:NCLRC.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Olivares-Cuhat, G.
    (2002) Learning strategies and achievement in the Spanish writing classroom: A case study. Foreign Language Annals, 35(5), 561–570.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. O’Malley, J.M. & Chamot, A.U.
    (1990) Language Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge, London: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Oxford, R.
    (1990) Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. New York: Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Oxford, R., Cho, Y., Leung, S. & Kim, H.J.
    (2004) Effect of the presence and difficulty of task on strategy use: An explanatory study. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 42, 1–47.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Paris, S.G. & Winograd, P.
    (1990) How metacognition can promote academic learning mainstream. InB.F. Jones & L. Idol(Eds.). Dimensions of Thinking and Cognitive Instruction (p. 15–51). NJ Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Ranalli, J.M.
    (2001) Consciousness Raising versus Deductive Approaches to Language Instruction: A Study of Learner Preferences. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Rubin, J.
    (1975) What the “good language learner” can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9(1), 41–51.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Rutherford, W.
    (1987) Second Language Grammar: Learning and Teaching. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Salataci, R. & Akyel, A.
    (2002) Possible effects of strategy instruction on L1 and L2 reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 14, 1–17.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Schraw, G. & Dennison, R.S.
    (1994) Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460–475.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Sharp, P.J.
    (2007) How to Prepare for the TOEFL. U.S.: Language Centers
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Setiadi, A.B., Holliday, L. & Lewis, R.
    (2005) A Survey of Language Learning Strategies in Tertiary EFL in Indonesia. RetrievedAugust 6, 2006, fromwww.aare.ed/au/01pap/won01419.html.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Shokrpour, N. & Fotovatian, S.
    (2006) Reading comprehension strategies as applied by Iranian EFL students. Indian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 32(1-2), 117–132.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Suzuki, R.
    (2007) Designing CR tasks for an economics English course. The Asian EAP Journal, 13(1), 1–12.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Takeuchi, O.
    (2003) What can we learn from good language learners: A qualitative study in the Japanese foreign language context. System, 31, 385–392.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Wharton, G.
    (2000) Language learning strategy use of bilingual foreign language learners in Singapore. Language Learning, 50(2), 203–243.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhang, L.J.
    (2000) Metacognition in L2 reading literacy acquisition: The case of ten Chinese tertiary students learning to read EFLInA. Brown(Ed.)English in Southeast Asia, 99: Developing Multiliteracies (pp. 83–96). Singapore: Nanyang technological university, Singapore
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhang, L. J.
    (2001) Awareness in reading: EFL students’ metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies in an acquisition-poor environment. Language Awareness10(4), 268–288.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. (2002) Exploring EFL reading as a metacognitive experience: Reader awareness and reading performance. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 12, 65–90.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. (2008) Constructivist pedagogy in strategic reading instruction: Exploring pathways to learner development in English as a second language (ESL) classroom. Instructional Science, 36(2), 89–116.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.2143/ITL.157.0.2042588
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error