1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
  4. Volume 158, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 158, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study examines the use of a Thai politeness marker, khráb (ครับ), by two Thai-English bilingual brothers, aged 11 and 15, during their 3-year stay in the U.S. By examining spontaneous speech data collected over eleven months (from Month 15 to Month 25 from time of arrival in the U.S.) in the boys’ home in the U.S., we show that the two brothers used progressively less khráb (ครับ) in speaking to their mother as time passed. The boys’ declining use of the politeness marker is explained in part by their greater use of other casual Thai particles as substitutes and, in the case of the younger brother, the English filler, ‘uh-huh.’ When the boys used khráb (ครับ), it was often for reasons other than for expressing politeness, such as to soften short responses and mitigate potential conflict. This paper argues that the boys’ use of this politeness marker reflects their ability to adapt to a new setting where there is less pressure to supply socially appropriate linguistic forms in Thai. By focusing on the continuing development of the first language of L2 learners of English, this paper presents a critical look at the changing linguistic needs of sojourners.

Instituut voor Toegepaste Linguistiek
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.2143/ITL.158.0.2046919
2009-01-01
2024-09-15

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.2143/ITL.158.0.2046919
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alfonzetti, G.
    (1998) The conversational dimension in code-switching between Italian and dialect in Sicily. InP., Auer (Ed.), Code-switching in conversation: Language, interaction, and identity (pp.180–211). London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Barry, J. S. J.
    (1967) Thai students in the United States: A study in attitude change. New York: Ithaca, Southeast Asia Program, Department of Asian Studies, Cornell University.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bayraktaroglu, A. & M. Sifianou
    (eds.) (2001) Linguistic Politeness across Boundaries: The Case of Greek and Turkish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Beeching, K.
    (2002) Gender, politeness and pragmatic particles in French. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bongartz, C. & Schneider, M. L.
    (2003) Linguistic development in social contexts: A study of two brothers learning German. The Modern Language Journal, 87 (1), 13–37.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown, P. & Levinson, S.
    (1987) Politeness, some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Chanseawrassamee, S. & Shin, S.J.
    (2009) Participant- and discourse-related code-switching by Thai-English bilingual adolescents. Multilingua, 28(1), 45–78.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Codman-Wilson, M. L.
    (1992) Thai cultural and religious identity and understanding of well¬being in the U.S.: An ethnographic study of an immigrant church. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Field of Joint Garrett/Northwestern Program in Religious and Theological Studies.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Cook, M.
    (1996) Translating forms of address. The Linguist35, 6.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Deephuengton, P.
    (1992) Politeness in Thai: Strategies of refusing and disagreeing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Economidou-Kogetsidis, M.
    (2008) Internal and external mitigation in interlanguage request production: The case of Greek learners of English. Journal of Politeness Research, 4(1), 111–137.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Grosjean, F.
    (1982) Life with two languages: An introduction to bilingualism. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Hendry, J.
    (1993) Wrapping culture: Politeness presentation and power in Japan and other societies. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Howard, K.
    (2004) Socializing respect in Northern Thailand. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 20(1), 1–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Iwasaki, S., & Horie, P. I.
    (2000) Creating speech register in Thai conversation. Language in Society, 29, 519–554.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Jørgensen, J. N.
    (1998) Children’s acquisition of code-switching for power-wielding. InP. Auer (Ed.), Code-switching in conversation: Language, interaction, and identity (pp.237–261). London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Kanno, Y.
    (2003) Negotiating bilingual and bicultural identities: Japanese returnees betwixt two worlds. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Kasper, G.
    (2001) Four perspectives on L2 pragmatic development. Applied Linguistics, 22(4), 502–530.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Kasper, G. & Blum-Kulka, S.
    eds.( 1993) Interlanguage pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C.
    (1997) A multi-level approach in the study of talk-in-interaction. Pragmatics7, 1:1–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Khanittanan, W.
    (1988) Some observations on expressing politeness in Thai. Language Sciences, 10(2), 353–362.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Li, W.
    (1998) The ‘why’ and ‘how’ questions in the analysis of conversational code-switching. InP. Auer (Ed.), Code-switching in conversation: Language, interaction, and identity (pp.156–176). London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Marquez Reiter, R.
    (2000) Linguistic Politeness in Britain and Uruguay: A Contrastive Study of Requests and Apologies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Matsuda, A.
    (2000) The use of English among Japanese returnees. English Today: The International Review of the English Language, 16(4): 49–55.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Ochs, E.
    (1993) Constructing social identity: A language socialization perspective. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26(3), 287–306.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Ochs, E., Taylor, C.
    (1992) Science at dinner. InC. Kramsch & S. McConnell-Ginet (Eds.),Text and context: Cross-disciplinary perspectives on language study (pp.29–45). Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath Company.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Peyasantiwong, P.
    (1981) Astudy of final particles in conversational Thai. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Michigan.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Reimers, D.
    (1985) Still the golden door: The third world comes to America. New York: Columbia University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Sakdisubha, K.
    (1987) Communication and assimilation patterns of two generations of Thai immigrants. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Norman, Oklahoma University.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Schegloff, E. A.
    (1982) Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. InD. Tannen (Ed.), Georgetown University Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics l98l; Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk (pp.71–93). Georgetown University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Sebba, M. & Wootten, T.
    (1998) We, they and identity: Sequential versus identity-related explanation in code-switching. InP. Auer (Ed.), Code-switching in conversation: Language, interaction, and identity (pp.262–286). London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Sharifian, F.
    (2008) Cultural schemas in L1 and L2 compliment responses: A study of Persian-speaking learners of English. Journal of Politeness Research, 4(1), 55–80.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Shin, S. J.
    (2005) Developing in two languages: Korean children in America. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Simpson, R. C.
    (1997) Negotiating identities in Thai conversation: A sociolinguistic discourse analysis of person-referring expressions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Michigan.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Smyth, D.
    (2002) Thai: An essential grammar. New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. U.S. Census Bureau
    U.S. Census Bureau (2004) Ancestry: 2000 RetrievedAugust 11, 2004, fromwww.census.gov/prod/2004pubs/c2kbr-35.pdf
  37. U.S. Embassy in Thailand
    U.S. Embassy in Thailand. (2005, March 24). Study in the U.S.A. RetrievedOctober 8, 2005, frombangkok.usembassy.gov/services/irc/ref_stu.htm
  38. Watts, R., S. Ide & E. Konrad
    (eds.) (1992) Politeness in language: Studies in its history, theory and practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Wibulpolprasert, S., & Pengpaibon, P.
    (2003) Integrated strategies to tackle the inequitable distribution of doctors in Thailand: Four decades of experience. Human Resources for Health, 1, November25, 1–12.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Wierzbicka, A.
    (1992) Cross-cultural pragmatics: The semantics of human interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Wong Fillmore, L.
    (1991) When learning a second language means losing the first. Early Childhood Research Journal Quarterly, 6, 323–346.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.2143/ITL.158.0.2046919
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error