1887
Volume 158, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This research intends to detect which instruction is most advisable for unknown English academic terms in first course students of English Philology. Fot this purpose it evaluates whether or not the context, with a small number of encounters (6) is superior to the visual help (expert cognitive pattern), obtained with the Pathfinder procedure (Schvaneveldt, Durso and Dearholt, 1989; Schvaneveldt, 1990; Thompson, Gomez and Schvaneveldt, 2000), when learning a complex vocabulary set; in this case, academic vocabulary (Coxhead, 1998). Results confirm that both types of instruction are useful when teaching this vocabulary however, context seems to be superior in spite of the small number of encounters used in the instruction. Bearing in mind the ease of getting appropriate contexts of use, this is the type of instruction that our research points to as the most recommendable.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.2143/ITL.158.0.2046921
2009-01-01
2019-08-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Academic Word List information
    Academic Word List information. www.vuw.ac.nz/lals/research/awl/info.html.
  2. Aitchison, J.
    (1994) Words in the mind: An introduction to the mental lexicon. Great Britain: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Amer, A. A.
    (2002) Advanced vocabulary instruction in EFL. I-TESL-J, 8(11). iteslj.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cain, K.
    (2007) Deriving word meanings from context: Does explanation facilitate contextual analysis?Journal of research and reading, 30 (4), 347–359.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cañas, J. J., Bajo, M. T., Navarro, R., Padilla, F., & Puerta, M. C.
    (1998) Representación mental y programación de ordenadores. Cognitiva, 1-2 (10), 239–255.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cohen, G.
    (1996) Memory for expertise. Memory in the real world. East Sussex: Psychology Press. 209–235.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cooke, N. M. & McDonald, J. E.
    (1986) A formal methodology for acquiring and representing expert knowledge. Proceedings of the IEEE, 74 (10), 1422–1430.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cooke, N. M., Durso, F. T., & Schvaneveldt, R. W.
    (1986) Recall and measures of memory organization. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, memory, and cognition, 12 (4), 538–549.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Coxhead, A.
    (1998) An academic word list, Occasional Publication Number 18, LALS, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Egan, D. E. & Schwartz, B. J.
    (1979) Chunking in recall of symbolic drawings. Memory and cognition, 7 (2), 149–158.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Erten, I. H. & Tekin, M.
    (2008) Effects on vocabulary acquisition of presenting new words in semantic sets versus semantically unrelated sets. System, 36, 407–422.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Ellis, N. C. & Beaton, A.
    (1993) Factors affecting the learning of foreign language vocabulary: Imagery keyword mediators and phonological short-term memory. The quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 46A (3), 533–558.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Ellis, N. C.
    (1994) Vocabulary acquisition: The implicit ins and outs of explicit cognitive mediation. InN. C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp.211–282). London: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Engle, R. W. & Bukstel, L.
    (1978) Memory processes among Bridge players of differing expertise. American journal of psychology, 91 (4), 673–689.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Fisher, P. & Blachowicz, C.
    (2007) Teaching how to think about words. Voices from the middle, 15 (1), 6–12.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Grandy, R. E.
    (1992) Semantic fields, prototypes, and the lexicon. InA. Lehrer and E. F. Kittay(eds.), Frames, fields and contrasts: New essays in semantic and lexical organization (pp.105–120). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Goldsmith, T. E., P. Johnson, P. J., & Acton, W. H.
    (1991) Assessing structural knowledge. Journal of educational psychology, 83 (1), 88–96.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gonzalvo, P., Cañas, J. J., & Bajo, M. T.
    (1994) Structural representations in knowledge acquisition. Journal of educational psychology, 86 (4), 601–616.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Google search engine
    Google search engine, scholar section. scholar.google.es
  20. Hashemi, R. H. & Gowdasiaei, F.
    (2005) An attribute-treatment interaction study: Lexical-set versus semantically unrelated vocabulary instruction. Regional language centre journal, 36(3), 341–361.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hill, M. M.
    2000 Words on the web: Taking vocabulary out of the classroom and into cyberspace. ONLINE-ED internet journal, University of Melbourne, Australia.www.edfac.unimelb.edu.au/online-ed/
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Horst, M., Cobb, T., & Nicolae, I.
    (2005) Expanding academic vocabulary with an interactive on-line database. Language, learning and technology, 9(2), 90–110.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Johnson, P. J., Goldsmith, T. E., & Teague, K. W.
    (1995) Similarity, structure, and knowledge: A representional approach to assessment. InP. D. Nichols, S. F. Chipman and R. L. Brennan (Eds.), Cognitively diagnostic assessment (pp.221–249). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Krashen, S. D.
    (1989) We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the Input Hypothesis. The modern language journal, 73, 440–464.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Laufer, B. & Nation, P.
    (1995) Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied linguistics, 16(3), 307–322.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Meara, P.
    (2005) Lexical frequency profiles: A Monte Carlo analysis. Applied linguistics, 26(1), 32–47.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Meara P. & Fitzpatrick, T.
    (2000) Lex30: An improved method of assessing productive vocabulary in an L2. System, 28(1), 19–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Meara. P., Lightbown, P. M., & Halter, R. H.
    (1997) Classrooms as lexical environments. Language teaching research, 1(1), 28–47.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Morris, L. & Cobb, T.
    (2004) Vocabulary profiles as predictors of TESL student performance. System, 32(1), 75–87.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Muncie, J.
    (2002) Process writing and vocabulary development: Comparing lexical frequency profiles across drafts. System, 30(2), 225–235.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Nassaji, H.
    (2003) L2 Vocabulary learning from context: Strategies, knowledge sources, and their relationship with success in L2 lexical inferencing. TESOL quarterly, 37(4), 645–670.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Nation, I. S. P.
    (2001) Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge U. P.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Nation, P. & Newton, J.
    (1997) Teaching vocabulary. InM. H. Long and J. C. Richards (Series Eds.) and J. Coady and T. Huckin(Vol. Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition (pp.238–254). New York: Cambridge U. P.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Rott, S.
    (1999) The effect of exposure frequency on intermediate language learners’ incidental vocabulary acquisition and retention through reading. Studies in second language acquisition, 21, 589–619.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Rowe, A. L., Cooke, N. L., Hall, E. P., & Halgren, T. L.
    (1996) Toward an on-line knowledge assessment methodology: Building on the relationship between knowing and doing. Journal of experimental psychology: Applied, 2 (1), 31–47.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Ruiz, J. C., Algarabel, S., Dasí, C., & Pitarque, A.
    (1998) El papel de los diagramas en la organización del conocimiento: Evidencia desde el Pathfinder y el escalamiento multidimensional. Psicológica, 19, 367–386.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Sánchez, M. J.
    (2001) Eficacia del Word Association Test y del Pathfinder para medir el aprendizaje léxico del inglés como lengua extranjera. Miscelánea. A journal of English and American studies, 23, 99–109.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. (2002) Efecto de la instrucción con patrones lingüísticos en el aprendizaje léxico: campo semántico ‘shine’. Estudios ingleses de la Universidad Complutense, 10, 183–199.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. (2003) Importancia de la composición de los campos semánticos en su aprendizaje. Miscelánea. A journal of English and American studies, 27, 229–248.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. (2004) Effect of instruction with expert patterns on the lexical learning of English as a foreign language. System, 32 (1), 89–102.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Sánchez, M. J. & González, L, M.
    (2006) Instrucción léxica y aprendizaje. Atlantis, 28(2), 89–107.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Saragi, T., Nation, P., & Meister, G.
    (1978) Vocabulary learning and reading. System, 6, 72–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Schvaneveldt, R. W.
    Ed. (1990) Pathfinder associative networks: Studies in knowledge organization. Norwood, New Jersey, Ablex Publishing Corporation.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Schvaneveldt, R. M., Durso, F. T., Goldsmith, T. E., Breen, T. J., Cooke, N. M., Tucker, R. G., & De Maio, J. C.
    (1985) Measuring the structure of expertise. International journal of man¬machine studies, 23(6), 699–728.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Schvaneveldt, R. W., Durso, F. T., & Dearholt, D. W.
    (1989) Network structures in proximity data. InG. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, 24 (pp.249–284). New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Shea, J. B. & Morgan, R. L.
    (1979) Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. Journal of experimental psychology: Human learning and memory, 5 (2), 179–187.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Singleton, D.
    (1997) Learning and processing L2 vocabulary. Language teaching30 (4), 213–225.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Smith, D. M. & Johnson, K. E.
    (1995) Effects of varying levels of expertise on Backgammon strategy prioritization. Poster presented at the 36th annual meeting of The Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Thompson, L. A., Gomez, R. L., & Schvaneveldt, R. W.
    (2000) The salience of temporal cues in the developing structure of event knowledge. American journal of psychology113 (4): 591–619.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Webb, S.
    (2007a) The effects of synonymy on second language vocabulary learning. Reading in a foreign language, 19(2), 120–136.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. (2007b) Learning word pairs and glossed sentences: The effects of a single context on vocabulary knowledge. Language teaching research, 11 (1), 63–81.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. (2008) The effects of context on incidental vocabulary learning. Reading in a foreign language, 20(2), 232–245.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. West, M.
    (1953) A general service list of English words. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.2143/ITL.158.0.2046921
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error