1887
Volume 3, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2799-6190
  • E-ISSN: 2799-8592

Abstract

This article examines the handling of Socially Acute Questions (SAQs) in the English language classroom. SAQs have been described as complex and controversial issues that are considered acute in society, in research and professional domains, and in educational contexts. Although intercultural communicative competence (ICC) is being encouraged by our educational authorities, teachers feel at a loss as to how to achieve that learning outcome in their teaching-learning units (TLUs). Many of them have encountered problems and even confl ct when trying to deal with SAQs. Even though they are struggling with a sense of frustration, they continue to consider that addressing such issues in their TLUs is key to 21st-century education. In this article, a customizable toolbox is proposed that second language (L2) teachers can draw from to foster and facilitate constructive intercultural dialogue when dealing with SAQs in their increasingly diverse English language classrooms. It starts off with a literature review providing perspectives on SAQs from transdisciplinarity, Social and Emotional Learning (SEL), and the Pedagogy of Encounter. It continues with an introduction to safe spaces, brave spaces, and story circles, as well as an overview of relevant concepts from cross-cultural pragmatics. The methods section then gives a detailed action-research-driven account of a racist incident that occurred in the author’s intervention group, a conversation class at the language institute of Université catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Belgium. Drawing from the literature review as well as the case study, and in the absence of institutional support to handle SAQs appropriately, the article concludes with a proposal for a customizable SAQs toolbox, meeting the stakeholders’ (the L2 learners’ and teachers’) academic expectations as well as emotional needs. Little or no work has been done so far on how to deal with SAQs in tertiary education. The actionable roadmap proposed in this article tries to bridge that gap. Even though the case study focuses on racism in the English language classroom, the customizable toolbox can be adapted across languages, academic disciplines, and other forms of discrimination.

Available under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.54754/incontext.v3i2.63
2023-11-30
2026-04-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bauler, Clara
    (2019) Speech acts and cross-cultural pragmatics. InNabat Erdogan & Michael Wei (Eds.), Applied Linguistics for Teachers of Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Learners (pp.223–238). IGI Global.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Biggs, John
    (1996) Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347–364.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. CASEL
    CASEL (2022) Collaborative for Academic, Social and Emotional Learning. RetrievedNovember 12, 2023fromhttps://casel.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Council of Europe
    Council of Europe (2015) Teaching Controversial Issues Through Education for Democratic Citizenship and Human Rights: Training Pack for Teachers. https://edoc.coe.int/en/human-rights-democratic-citizenship-and-interculturalism/7738-teaching-controversial-issues.html
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Deardorff, Darla K.
    (2020) Manual for Developing Intercultural Competencies: Story Circles. UNESCO Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Gadamer, Hans-Georg
    (1975) Truth and Method (Joel Weinsheimer & Donald G. Marshall, Eds.). Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gill, Scherto
    (2015) “Holding oneself open in a conversation” — Gadamerws philosophical hermeneutics and the ethics of dialogue. Journal of Dialogue Studies, 3(1), 9–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Herweg, Karl Günter, Thomas Tribelhorn, Anna Lena Lewis, Isabelle Providoli, Lilian Julia Trechsel and Camilla Maria Steinböck
    (2021) Transdisciplinary Learning for Sustainable Development. Sharing Experience in Course and Curriculum Design. Centre for Development and Environment (CDE), University of Bern and Educational Development Unit, University of Bern. https://boris.unibe.ch/157343/8/150dpi_online_E_tdLearnSD.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kawasaki, Johanna
    (2020, August20). The Dos & Don’ts of Error Correction when Teaching English. Bridge Universe. RetrievedNovember 12, 2023fromhttps://bridge.edu/tefl/blog/error-correction-teaching-english/
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Legardez, Alain
    (2017) Propositions pour une modélisation des processus de didactisation sur des Questions Socialement Vives [Proposals for modeling didactization processes on Socially Acute Questions]. Sisyphus. Journal of Education, 5(2), 82–99.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Legardez, Alain and Laurence Simonneaux
    (2006) L’école à l’épreuve de l’actualité [School tested by current events]. ESF.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Menzies, Felicity
    (2015, April16). Effective Cross-cultural Communication. include-empower.com. RetrievedNovember 12, 2023fromhttps://cultureplusconsulting.com/2015/04/16/effective-cross-cultural-communication/
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Pascual, Paola
    (2022, August2). A Quick Guide to Asking Better Questions in Cross Cultural Workplaces. Talaera. RetrievedNovember 12, 2023fromhttps://blog.talaera.com/asking-better-questions
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Pickering, Kate
    (2021, December14). Promoting Student Well-Being through English. Macmillan Education. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PcYGcIoHns8
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Plutchik, Robert
    (2001) The nature of emotions: Human emotions have deep evolutionary roots, a fact that may explain their complexity and provide tools for clinical practice. American Scientist, 89(4), 344–350. (Original work published 1980)
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Shelton, Jama, Kel Kroehle and Maria Monica Andia
    (2019) The trans person is not the problem: Brave spaces and structural competence as educative tools for trans justice in social work. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 46(4), 97–123.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Stradling, Robert, Michael Noctor and Bridget Baines
    (1984) Teaching Controversial Issues. Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.54754/incontext.v3i2.63
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error