- Home
- e-Journals
- Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter
- Previous Issues
- Volume 24, Issue 1, 2021
Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter - Volume 24, Issue 1, 2021
Volume 24, Issue 1, 2021
-
Antiochus’ and Cicero’s different theories of memory in the Lucullus
Author(s): Vittorio Höslepp.: 1–17 (17)More LessAbstractThe essay deals with an important epistemological debate in the Lucullus: Can there be remembrance of false beliefs, as Cicero argues against his interlocutor, who defends Antiochus’ position? It is shown that Antiochus, like Aristoteles, considers ‘remember’ to be a double achievement verb: Remembrance occurs only if a correct past perception is faithfully transmitted to the present. Cicero, on the other hand, insists that faithful transmission can also occur with false beliefs. The distinction seems to be analogous to that between valid and sound inference in contemporary Stoic logic. Finally, I discuss differences between ancient and modern forms of skepticism, address the issue of why misremembering plays no role in the Lucullus, and find an answer in Cicero’s doctrine of the orator.
-
Cicero, Academica 1.45
Author(s): Charles Snyderpp.: 18–34 (17)More LessAbstractFocused on the reference to Socrates’ confession of ignorance at Academica 1.45, this paper challenges the common assumption that the passage transmits Arcesilaus’ conception of Socrates. This paper develops in two steps a more plausible reading of the passage. According to this reading, Cicero presents an interpretation of Arcesilaus’ historical relation to Socrates. In conclusion, the paper argues that traditional readings of Acad. 1.45 underestimate not only Cicero’s originality as an historical thinker, but also his clever reconstruction of Academic history, as it effectively opposes the controversial Academic history defended by Antiochus in the early first century BCE.
-
„Virtus cerebri – organum animae“
Author(s): Udo Reinhold Jeckpp.: 35–106 (72)More LessAbstractThe first part of this essay analyses the beginning of the philosophy of the brain in early Greece by looking at the Pythagorean theories of the brain. The knowledge of this innovative achievement of the Pythagorean school was never completely lost; it also got through to the Middle Ages.
The second part focuses on the effect of Pythagorean thinking on Albert the Great. Albert systematically studied all available sources on Pythagoreanism and in doing so acquired extensive knowledge of this philosophical movement. In the process, he also thought through the psychology of the Pythagoreans and came across their brain theory, which he carefully analysed, commented on, and criticised.
Albert interpreted the brain-theoretical theses of the Pythagoreans that came to his knowledge from the viewpoint of a speculative construct of Pythagorean psychology, but in essence his accounts, as the third part of this article proves, match the historically secured facts from ancient sources: Albert knew that the Pythagoreans had not only thought out the relationship between mind and brain, but had also considered the question, which is so intensely debated today, whether animals think.
The fourth and final part concludes the investigation by reconstructing the basic lines of Albert’s own brain theory: Albert developed a philosophy of the mind which, although allowing a mediated relationship of the intellect with the brain, rather emphasised the separation of the mind from the somatic sphere. From his point of view, the brain has no decisive function in the thought process. Because the Pythagoreans had thought differently, Albert only took critical note of their views.
-
Humanismus und Wahrheit
Author(s): Esteban Lawpp.: 107–128 (22)More LessAbstractThis paper analyses the Verlagsanzeige of the humanist, mathematician, astronomer and publisher Johannes Regiomontanus (1436–1476). How is humanism expressed in this famous document from German early printing and what is its relationship to philosophy? The article shows that Regiomontanus advocated a special form of humanism that went beyond the standard humanism that he valued, with ‘truth’ as its most important aspect. From the epistemological perspective of the history of philosophy in Regiomontanus’s publishing programme, the ‘truth’ of mathematics is seen, analogous to some predecessors, as a paradigm of programmatic testimony. The integration of philosophy is evident in this, as in another specified way as well.
-
Kritik über Pietsch, Krämer, Menze, Nölker, Dörrie, Baltes & Pietsch (2020): Die philosophische Lehre des Platonismus. Die Ethik im antiken Platonismus der Kaiserzeit. Bausteine 231-252: Text, Übersetzung, Kommentar
Author(s): Thomas Zimmerpp.: 158–163 (6)More LessThis article reviews Die philosophische Lehre des Platonismus. Die Ethik im antiken Platonismus der Kaiserzeit. Bausteine 231-252: Text, Übersetzung, Kommentar
-
Kritik über Überweg, Cesalli & Hartung (): Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie & Imbach, Schulthess, Cesalli, Imbach, de Libera, Ricklin & Heller (2021): Die Philosophie des Mittelalters
Author(s): Norbert Winklerpp.: 164–185 (22)More LessThis article reviews Grundriss der Geschichte der PhilosophieDie Philosophie des Mittelalters
-
Kritik über Olivi, Nickl & Franco (2021): Traktat über Verträge
Author(s): Christian Rodepp.: 186–191 (6)More LessThis article reviews Traktat über Verträge
-
Kritik über Flashar (2020): Hellenistische Philosophie
Author(s): Jan Kerkmannpp.: 192–200 (9)More LessThis article reviews Hellenistische Philosophie
-
Review of Zwollo (2018): St Augustine and Plotinus: The Human Mind as Image of the Divine
Author(s): Juan C. Riverapp.: 201–203 (3)More LessThis article reviews St Augustine and Plotinus: The Human Mind as Image of the Divine
-
Kritik über Robert (2021): Épicure aux enfers. Hérésie, athéisme et hédonisme au Moyen Âge
Author(s): Carsten Flaigpp.: 204–214 (11)More LessThis article reviews Épicure aux enfers. Hérésie, athéisme et hédonisme au Moyen Âge
Volumes & issues
-
Volume 25 (2022)
-
Volume 24 (2021)
-
Volume 23 (2020)
-
Volume 22 (2019)
-
Volume 21 (2018)
-
Volume 20 (2017)
-
Volume 19 (2016)
-
Volume 18 (2015)
-
Volume 17 (2014)
-
Volume 16 (2013)
-
Volume 15 (2012)
-
Volume 14 (2011)
-
Volume 13 (2008)
-
Volume 12 (2007)
-
Volume 11 (2006)
-
Volume 10 (2005)
-
Volume 9 (2004)
-
Volume 8 (2003)
-
Volume 7 (2002)
-
Volume 6 (2001)
-
Volume 5 (2000)
-
Volume 4 (1999)
-
Volume 3 (1998)
-
Volume 2 (1997)
-
Volume 1 (1996)
Most Read This Month
-
-
Aquinas’ Balancing Act
Author(s): Gyula Klima
-
- More Less