Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter - Current Issue
Volume 25, Issue 1, 2022
-
Geist – Gehirn – Mythos
Author(s): Udo Reinhold Jeckpp.: 1–77 (77)More LessAbstractGreek mythology developed ideas about the mythical birth of Athena from the head of Zeus in enigmatic allusions. Hephaestus performed the obstetrics. This cryptic mythologem, an imaginative structure of strange shape, contains a message from archaic Greece of unfathomable depth and furthermore has an extensive history of influence. After introductory remarks, the first part (A) of this paper contains a collection of the most important written sources that convey basic elements of the birth myth of Athena. Its allegorical interpretation was initially undertaken by Stoic philosophers. Therefore, the second part (B) first reconstructs the integration and transformation of traditional myths into Stoic philosophy. Because the Stoics used basic aspects of their psychology for this purpose, investigations into Stoic psychology and localisation theory follow in the third part (C). Chrysippus used these constructions for an allegorical interpretation of the birth myth of Athena. Therefore, the fourth part (D) analyses his exegesis of this mythologem, about which extensive information is available, and subsequently Galen’s criticism of it. The famous philosophising physician moreover developed his own allegorical interpretation of the birth myth of Athena, drawing on his wealth of knowledge about the anatomy and physiology of the brain. The analysis of some significant statements on the ‘cerebral birth of Athena’ then follows in the fifth and last part (E). Documents from late antique literature, from Byzantine exegetes of Homer, comments from early medieval writers, the reflection of a modern brain anatomist and interpretations of this myth from the 19th century are discussed. An outlook with information on interdisciplinary brain research concludes the study.
-
The contingency of prophetic semantics in Walter Chatton’s Lectura
Author(s): Jon Bornholdtpp.: 78–97 (20)More LessAbstractThis paper examines Walter Chatton’s discussion of the problem of prophesied future contingents in his Lectura super Sententias. Faced with the challenge of reconciling the supposedly veridical character of divine prophecy with human freedom to do otherwise, Chatton casts the relation of prophecy to event in the form of a logical consequentia and formulates two rules which depend on the character of the antecedent in question. In the case of antecedents involving divine knowledge and related phenomena, the freedom of the wayfarer to do otherwise is secured by the assumption that the consequence is necessary but the antecedent is semantically contingent. In the case of concrete utterances and phenomena, on the other hand, the wayfarer’s freedom is secured by the assumption that the consequence itself is contingent. Chatton’s treatment, while analytically subtle and rigorous, leaves a number of important questions unanswered, most notably that of the ontological openness or closure of the future. Nevertheless, it is interesting both in its own right and insofar as it provides a clarifying source for Chatton’s later discussion of the same topic in his Quodlibet.
-
On Thomas de Clivis Sen. and some other late medieval arts masters in Paris, Prague, and Vienna
Author(s): Harald Bergerpp.: 98–117 (20)More LessAbstractThis paper presents new results regarding six Arts Masters of the Late Middle Ages. First of all, a new search target for the lost work Logica of Thomas of Cleves is suggested: a question commentary on Peter of Spain should be searched for. Second, recent research has shown that John of Hokelem is a prolific author: further findings are added here. A third notable magister artium Parisiensis of the late 14th century is Christian of Ackoy: in addition to his known works, some new findings are discussed as possible or even probable works by him. Finally, the bibliography of an important magister artium Pragensis, Helmold of Salzwedel, as well as that of two Viennese Arts Masters, Conrad Seglauer and John Gossolt, is improved. In this way, the paper offers new insights into the manuscript tradition of late medieval philosophy and provides some corrections to the standard literature (C. H. Lohr, M. Markowski, and others).
-
Die Leipziger Quodlibet-Disputation von 1514
Author(s): Hans-Ulrich Wöhlerpp.: 118–137 (20)More LessAbstractIn 1514 at the Faculty of Arts of the University of Leipzig, a quodlibetical disputation took place. About 60 persons participated in the disputation. A handwritten record of this event has been preserved. A thorough analysis of these texts gives us a wealth of information with regard to the themes, positions, and tendencies of thinking during that period of time. The scholars at Leipzig University made an attempt at reconciling their philosophical interests with the claim to spiritual hegemony on the part of theology and the church. This aspect is remarkable if one thinks of the famous papal bull Apostolici Regiminis, promulgated in the year 1513. The attached appendix lists the topics and the names of the participants of the disputation according to the record.
-
Eine vergessene Ausgabe von Ciceros De natura deorum
Author(s): Günter Gawlickpp.: 138–175 (38)More LessAbstractThis article wants to recall a hitherto unnoticed edition of Cicero’s De Natura Deorum, which the classical philologist Matthäus Dresser (1536–1615) published with an extensive commentary. This edition, however, represents a remarkable peculiarity within the reception history of Cicero’s text, since Dresser neither claims to be a philologist, interested in textual criticism, nor a neutral historian of the philosophy of religion. Rather, as an apologetically oriented Protestant in times of confessional conflict, he is concerned with the argumentative validity of the different answers to the questions discussed in Cicero’s text: Do gods exist? What qualities do they have? What activities do they display? And which relevance do these answers have for Christian monotheism? Hence, we may speak of a selective commentary, first and foremost interested in the truth or falsehood of the various answers to these main questions, in order to set contemporary readers (especially scholars and students) on the right track and to save them from severe religious errors. Dresser aims to achieve his goal by adding to the text not only extensive Annotationes, but also an introductory Argumentum to each of the three Ciceronian books of De Natura Deorum. He also gives two Disputationes (in the form of theses) at the end of each book, which provide a résumé and further guidance on interpretation. Thus he firmly rejects the atomism of Epicureanism and its denial of Providence, as explained in the first book. Dresser has to take a differentiated view of the views of Stoicism as presented in the second book: Besides many beneficial doctrines, this school of philosophers also holds fatalistic and pantheistic views which have to be rejected as dangerous to the Christian faith. As the sceptic Cotta radically rebukes the religious views of Epicureanism in the third book, but also attacks in large part Stoic theism and its idea of providence, which is also dear to Dresser’s heart, he is forced to oppose academic scepticism. This gives rise to a “theodicy” avant la lettre by Dresser, since Cottas denial of providence had also argued with the existence of evil in God’s creation. The Epicurean conceptions of God are thus not an option. Those of Stoicism are acceptable if purged of dangerous elements. Scepticism in its radical academic form must be eliminated by argument. In this article, these features of Dresser’s Annotationes and Disputationes are described and analysed in detail. Important parts of his commentaries are quoted in the author’s translation. Completely translated are the Disputationes 1 and 2 to Book III, dealing with the sceptical ’epoché’ or retention of judgement. Thus, the contribution not only represents a unique example of the reception of Cicero’s De Natura Deorum in the age of confessionalism, but also gives an insight into the reception of the three Hellenistic schools of philosophy in the early modern period in general, especially that of scepticism.
-
Review of Scalvini (2021): Aristotle: From Antiquity to the Modern Era
Author(s): Joan Tellopp.: 201–211 (11)More LessThis article reviews Aristotle: From Antiquity to the Modern Era
-
Kritik über Hitz (2020): Theorie und Praxis in der Philosophie der Antike. Demokrit, die Sokratiker, Platon und Aristoteles
Author(s): Stefan Düfelpp.: 212–218 (7)More LessThis article reviews Theorie und Praxis in der Philosophie der Antike. Demokrit, die Sokratiker, Platon und Aristoteles
-
Crítica de Hadot & Vallat (2020): Simplicius the Neoplatonist in light of contemporary research. A critical review
Author(s): Álvaro Fernández Fernándezpp.: 219–281 (63)More LessThis article reviews Simplicius the Neoplatonist in light of contemporary research. A critical review
-
Kritik über Seiler (2016): Die pythagoreisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Grundlagen der Hochzeitszahl aus Platons „Staat“
Author(s): Beate Fränzlepp.: 282–294 (13)More LessThis article reviews Die pythagoreisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Grundlagen der Hochzeitszahl aus Platons „Staat“
-
Review of Han (2019): Confucianism and Reflexive Modernity: Bringing Community back to Human Rights in the Age of Global Risk Society
Author(s): Emilian Kavalskipp.: 295–298 (4)More LessThis article reviews Confucianism and Reflexive Modernity: Bringing Community back to Human Rights in the Age of Global Risk Society
-
Kritik über Heitsch (2021): Gesammelte Schriften IV. Zu Homer, Platon, Thukydides und Paulus
Author(s): Jan Kerkmannpp.: 299–310 (12)More LessThis article reviews Gesammelte Schriften IV. Zu Homer, Platon, Thukydides und Paulus
-
Kritik über Ockham, Kilcullen & Scott (2020): Dialogus, Part 1, Books 1–5
Author(s): Christian Rodepp.: 311–316 (6)More LessThis article reviews Dialogus, Part 1, Books 1–5
-
Kritik über Magnus, Anzulewicz & Klünker (2022): De unitate intellectus – Über die Einzigkeit des Intellekts
Author(s): Norbert Winklerpp.: 317–340 (24)More LessThis article reviews De unitate intellectus – Über die Einzigkeit des Intellekts
-
Kritik über Gassendi & Zekl (2022): De vita et moribus Epicuri – Über Leben und Charakter Epikurs
Author(s): Norbert Winklerpp.: 341–350 (10)More LessThis article reviews De vita et moribus Epicuri – Über Leben und Charakter Epikurs
-
Kritik über Wöhrle, Tsiampokalos & Lammer (2022): Alkmaion von Kroton, Hippon von Metapont und Menestor von Sybaris
Author(s): Thomas Zimmerpp.: 351–354 (4)More LessThis article reviews Alkmaion von Kroton, Hippon von Metapont und Menestor von Sybaris
Volumes & issues
-
Volume 25 (2022)
-
Volume 24 (2021)
-
Volume 23 (2020)
-
Volume 22 (2019)
-
Volume 21 (2018)
-
Volume 20 (2017)
-
Volume 19 (2016)
-
Volume 18 (2015)
-
Volume 17 (2014)
-
Volume 16 (2013)
-
Volume 15 (2012)
-
Volume 14 (2011)
-
Volume 13 (2008)
-
Volume 12 (2007)
-
Volume 11 (2006)
-
Volume 10 (2005)
-
Volume 9 (2004)
-
Volume 8 (2003)
-
Volume 7 (2002)
-
Volume 6 (2001)
-
Volume 5 (2000)
-
Volume 4 (1999)
-
Volume 3 (1998)
-
Volume 2 (1997)
-
Volume 1 (1996)
Most Read This Month Most Read RSS feed
-
-
Aquinas’ Balancing Act
Author(s): Gyula Klima
-
- More Less