- Home
- e-Journals
- Information Design Journal
- Previous Issues
- Volume 15, Issue, 2007
Information Design Journal - Volume 15, Issue 3, 2007
Volume 15, Issue 3, 2007
-
Discourse, cognition and communication
Author(s): Ted Sanders and Leo Lentzpp.: 197–198 (2)More Less
-
Discourse cohesion in text and tutorial dialogue
Author(s): Arthur C. Graesser, Moongee Jeon, Yan Yan and Zhiqiang Caipp.: 199–213 (15)More LessDiscourse cohesion is presumably an important facilitator of comprehension when individuals read texts and hold conversations. This study investigated components of cohesion and language in different types of discourse about Newtonian physics: A textbook, textoids written by experimental psychologists, naturalistic tutorial dialoguebetween expert human tutors and college students, andAutoTutor tutorial dialogue between a computer tutor and students (AutoTutor is an animated pedagogical agent that helps students learn about physics by holding conversations in natural language). We analyzed the four types of discourse with Coh-Metrix, a software tool that measures discourse on different components of cohesion, language, and readability. The cohesion indices included co-reference, syntactic and semantic similarity, causal cohesion, incidence of cohesion signals (e.g., connectives, logical operators), and many other measures. Cohesion data were quite similar for the two forms of discourse in expository monologue (textbooks and textoids) and for the two types of tutorial dialogue (i.e., students interacting with human tutors and AutoTutor), but very different between the discourse of expository monologue and tutorial dialogue. Coh-Metrix was also able to detect subtle differences in the language and discourse of AutoTutor versus human tutoring.
-
Linguistics markers of coherence improve text comprehension in functional contexts
Author(s): Ted Sanders, Jentine Land and Gerben Mulderpp.: 219–235 (17)More LessText coherence can be marked linguistically by using connectives and lexical signals that make coherence relations explicit. This study focuses on the influence of such markers on text comprehension in ecologically valid contexts. A first experiment shows how readers in a business meeting and in a laboratory study benefit from the explicit marking of coherence relations. A second experiment shows how poor readers in secondary education benefit from coherence marking while answering text comprehension questions. We argue in favor of an interaction between cognitively oriented research on discourse representation and document design research, to solve crucial questions like: how do we design optimally readable texts?
-
Using structural cues to guide readers on the internet
Author(s): Jan H. Spyridakis, Kathryn A. Mobrand, Elisabeth Cuddihy and Carolyn Y. Weipp.: 242–259 (18)More LessThis paper reviews three studies that examined how users performance is affected by the (1) explicitness of local navigational links, (2) intriguing and informative phrasing of hyperlinks, and (3) text previews and navigational menus. The results reveal that sites with highly explicit navigational links increase site exploration as well as site perceptions; a mismatch between navigation and embedded link labels increases comprehension and site exploration; and previews with embedded links increase inferential comprehension, though they are disliked. We suggest a combined approach to structural cueing and emphasize that good design is context specific – designs that support comprehension do not necessarily receive high marks for usability.
-
Reading aloud and the delay of feedback: Explanations for the effectiveness of reader protocols
Author(s): Leo Lentz and Henk Pander Maatpp.: 266–281 (16)More LessAn important objective of research in information design is the validation of methods that are available for the evaluation of public information. In this article three evaluation methods using verbal self-reports are compared: think aloud reader protocols, the plus-minus method and Focus (a software tool designed to collect reader responses on documents). The results of this comparison indicate that reader protocols produce better feedback on comprehension problems than the other two methods. In a series of experiments two aspects of reader protocols are further investigated in order to explain these results. The first factor is delay of feedback, which seems to result in fewer problem detections. The second factor is reading aloud, which may result in more problem detections. These experiments indicate that delay is the key factor. Finally an eye tracking study was done in order to analyze the effect on the reading process of reading aloud and giving comments. The results indicate that reading aloud causes a delay in the reading process and the task of giving comments increases the number of times readers look back in the text while reading.
Volumes & issues
-
Volume 29 (2024)
-
Volume 28 (2023)
-
Volume 27 (2022)
-
Volume 26 (2021)
-
Volume 25 (2019)
-
Volume 24 (2018)
-
Volume 23 (2017)
-
Volume 22 (2016)
-
Volume 21 (2014)
-
Volume 20 (2013)
-
Volume 19 (2011)
-
Volume 18 (2010)
-
Volume 17 (2009)
-
Volume 16 (2008)
-
Volume 15 (2007)
-
Volume 14 (2006)
-
Volume 13 (2005)
-
Volume 12 (2004)
-
Volume 11 (2002)
-
Volume 10 (2000)
-
Volume 9 (1998)
-
Volume 8 (1995)
-
Volume 7 (1993)
-
Volume 6 (1990)
-
Volume 5 (1986)
-
Volume 4 (1984)
-
Volume 3 (1982)
-
Volume 2 (1981)
-
Volume 1 (1979)
Most Read This Month
Article
content/journals/1569979x
Journal
10
5
false

-
-
News framing: Theory and typology
Author(s): Claes H. Vreese
-
-
-
Creative data literacy
Author(s): Catherine D'Ignazio
-
-
-
Designing with a 2½D attitude
Author(s): Colin Ware
-
- More Less