- Home
- e-Journals
- Interpreting
- Previous Issues
- Volume 22, Issue 1, 2020
Interpreting - Volume 22, Issue 1, 2020
Volume 22, Issue 1, 2020
-
The impact of simultaneous-interpreting prosody on comprehension
Author(s): Cédric Lenglet and Christine Michauxpp.: 1–34 (34)More LessAbstractDoes the particular prosody of simultaneous interpreting have an impact on comprehensibility? This paper presents an experiment that sought to answer this question. Two groups of listeners (47 with relevant contextual knowledge about the subject-matter of the speech and 40 with less contextual knowledge) listened to the interpretation into French of a 20-minute lecture in German under two conditions (the actual interpretation and a read-aloud rendition of the transcript of the interpretation by the same interpreter) and answered comprehension questions. The prosodic features of the two conditions were analysed, and differences regarding the temporal organisation of speech, disfluencies, pitch register and the interface between prosody and syntax emerged. Simultaneous interpreting was found to be more monotonous, to contain a larger number of short and long silent pauses, more hesitations (“euh”) and more non-syntactic pauses as well as to have a more irregular speech rate. The read-aloud version was livelier, with more medium-length silent pauses and almost no hesitation. Results of the comprehension questionnaire do not demonstrate that interpreting-specific prosodic features affect comprehensibility to a significant extent. This is consistent with professional norms of interpreting in specialised conferences, where verbal aspects have priority over non-verbal ones.
-
Interpreters’ perceived characteristics and perception of quality in interpreting
Author(s): Andrew K. F. Cheungpp.: 35–55 (21)More LessAbstractThis study examined the link between listeners’ perceptions of the quality of interpretation and their beliefs about the interpreter. Two groups of Mandarin-speaking participants were shown a video of a speech by President Obama being interpreted into Mandarin Chinese by a non-native Mandarin-speaking interpreter. The participants in one group were shown a photo of a Chinese-looking man alongside the video and those in the other group were shown a photo of a non-Chinese-looking man. The quantitative results showed that those who believed they were listening to a non-Chinese interpreter judged the interpretation more positively than those who believed they were listening to a Chinese interpreter. The qualitative results showed that the participants in the non-Chinese condition attributed the non-native features of the interpretation to the interpreter’s being a foreigner, and that they naturally used the language competence of non-native speakers as the standard of comparison. In this case, the participants’ perceptions of quality could also be explained by the interpreter’s perceived association with a highly esteemed group in China, and his ability to interpret into Chinese generated a sense of national self-esteem among the participants. Overall, the findings show that factors other than the features identifiable in an interpretation can influence the perception of quality of interpretation.
-
The interpreter as a sequential coordinator in courtroom interaction
Author(s): Christian Licoppe and Clair-Antoine Veyrierpp.: 56–86 (31)More LessAbstractWe present here an ethnographic study of asylum court interpreting with remote participants and video links. First, we describe the multimodal resources interpreters have at their disposal to manage turn-taking and begin interpreting while an asylum seeker’s answer to a question has not come yet to a recognizable completion point. We distinguish between ‘implicit’ configurations, in which a collaborative turn transition is apparently achieved through reorientations of body and gaze, the use of discourse markers, or other conversational strategies, like overlaps and cases where a turn transition is achieved through the use of ‘explicit’ resources such as instructions to stop and requests to give brief answers. We show that the collaborative production of such long answers is affected by the remote placement of the interpreter, and that recurrent trouble in the management of turn transitions between the asylum seeker and the interpreter during extended narratives may be detrimental to the asylum seeker’s case.
-
Pragmalinguistic challenges for trainee interpreters in achieving accuracy
Author(s): Xin Liupp.: 87–116 (30)More LessAbstractIn cross-examination, questions are used by counsel as powerful tools to control witness testimonies. In bilingual courtrooms, conveying the subtlety in the use of questions from one language to another is crucial for all participants. However, achieving a high level of accuracy is extremely demanding due to the intricacy of courtroom discourse and the complexity of interpreting in such an institutional setting. Drawing on a moot court exercise at the University of New South Wales, Sydney, this study investigates the most common pragmalinguistic challenges for trainee interpreters in achieving accuracy when interpreting cross-examination questions from English to Mandarin. Findings show that it can be challenging to produce pragmatically accurate renditions: Mandarin interpretations have an overall weakened illocutionary force compared to the original English questions. In particular, declaratives, reported speech declaratives, modal interrogatives, and tag questions are found to be difficult to interpret into Mandarin. This paper also explores the way the illocutionary force of the interpreted questions deviates from the original and the possible causes for this shift. Findings point to the need to enhance pragmatic competence among trainee interpreters, which in turn will require specialised training for interpreters working in legal settings.
-
The process of note-taking in consecutive interpreting
Author(s): Sijia Chenpp.: 117–139 (23)More LessAbstractThis article reports the findings of an empirical study on the process of note-taking in consecutive interpreting (CI). The focus is on the data collected via digital pen recording and voice recording while professional interpreters performed CI between Chinese (L1) and English (L2). In both directions of interpreting, the study found that the interpreters preferred language to symbol and English to Chinese. It was also found that the physical and temporal demands of symbol and abbreviation notes were lower than those of language and full word notes, respectively, whereas the ear-pen span (EPS) of symbol notes was longer than that of language notes. As to the relationship between note-taking and interpreting performance, the data showed that a higher percentage of English notes was correlated with a worse performance in both directions of interpreting. There were also some differences between the directions: in E-C interpreting, the performance was better when the EPS was shorter, when the participants used more symbol notes, and when they used fewer language notes, but in C-E interpreting, the quality of performance was positively correlated with the quantity of notes.
-
Eva N.S. Ng. Common law in an uncommon courtroom: Judicial interpreting in Hong Kong
Author(s): Ludmila Sternpp.: 150–155 (6)More LessThis article reviews Common law in an uncommon courtroom: Judicial interpreting in Hong Kong
-
Adolfo M. García. The neurocognition of translation and interpreting
Author(s): Alexis Hervais-Adelmanpp.: 156–161 (6)More LessThis article reviews The neurocognition of translation and interpreting
Volumes & issues
-
Volume 25 (2023)
-
Volume 24 (2022)
-
Volume 23 (2021)
-
Volume 22 (2020)
-
Volume 21 (2019)
-
Volume 20 (2018)
-
Volume 19 (2017)
-
Volume 18 (2016)
-
Volume 17 (2015)
-
Volume 16 (2014)
-
Volume 15 (2013)
-
Volume 14 (2012)
-
Volume 13 (2011)
-
Volume 12 (2010)
-
Volume 11 (2009)
-
Volume 10 (2008)
-
Volume 9 (2007)
-
Volume 8 (2006)
-
Volume 7 (2005)
-
Volume 6 (2004)
-
Volume 5 (2000)
-
Volume 4 (1999)
-
Volume 3 (1998)
-
Volume 2 (1997)
-
Volume 1 (1996)
Most Read This Month

-
-
The bilingual individual
Author(s): Francois Grosjean
-
- More Less