- Home
- e-Journals
- Journal of Historical Pragmatics
- Previous Issues
- Volume 26, Issue 1, 2025
Journal of Historical Pragmatics - Volume 26, Issue 1, 2025
Volume 26, Issue 1, 2025
-
From affirmation to concession
Author(s): Haiping Long and Weihua Zhoupp.: 1–38 (38)More LessAbstractThe Modern Chinese concessive connective kě shì (e.g., kàn shàngqù bù zěnmeyàng, kě shì chī qǐlái què tǐng bùcuò [‘it looks not so good, but it tastes quite good’]) did not develop from a clause-initial emphatic kě shì structure that has a pragmatic counter expectation meaning (e.g., kě shì tā shuōde [‘it was really she who said it’]), but from an affirmative response marker kě shì in Early Modern Chinese (e.g., kě shì ne, míng’er nǐ sòngwǒ shénme? [‘quite right, what do you send me as gifts tomorrow?’]). Shì in the connective did not develop from a copula shì, but from an adjective shì meaning ‘right, true’ (e.g., rán, shì yě [‘right, it’s true’]). The hypothesised pathway may be explained as the grammaticalisation of an affirmative response marker used in the context of token agreement, and may be adopted to account for the formation of an Old Chinese concessive connective rán (e.g., rán Zhèng wáng, zǐ yì yǒu bùlì yān [‘but if Zheng State perishes, it serves you no good, either’]). It gives support to an extra-clausal source for the formation of a sentence connective.
-
“Yet ar ye not lyche, for thu art a fals strumpet”
Author(s): Olga Timofeeva and Leena Kahlas-Tarkkapp.: 39–68 (30)More LessAbstractIn Late Middle English, the system of second-person pronouns with singular referents is characterised by retractable choices based on the interactional status of interlocutors. This system has until recently been documented mostly in studies based on poetic texts, such as the Canterbury Tales by Chaucer, and, to a lesser extent, private correspondence and mystery plays. We use the Book of Margery Kempe as a primary source and offer the perspective of a middle-class female author from early-fifteenth-century Norfolk. Conventional politeness of Margery Kempe requires the default use of ye/you/your forms, especially when addressees are unfamiliar, older or socially superior, but also in situations of mutual acceptance and deference. Thou/thee/thine forms, on the other hand, indicate social or intellectual superiority as well as, at the interactional level, condescension, contempt, annoyance, defiance and abuse. Their use, therefore, is typically marked.
-
Presenting manuscript tables and diagrams to the Middle English reader
Author(s): Matti Peikola and Mari-Liisa Varilapp.: 69–99 (31)More LessAbstractIn this paper, we examine information-organising graphic devices such as tables and diagrams in Middle English manuscripts. Our focus is on text producers’ metadiscourse describing these devices and instructing the reader in their use. We also pay attention to the visual and spatial relationship between the graphic device and the surrounding text. Our findings indicate that the metadiscourse associated with graphic devices serves similar functions to image captions (verbal cueing) in modern textbooks: identifying and describing the devices and instructing the reader in using them.
-
Negotiating converso identities in the inquisition courtroom
Author(s): Javier E. Díaz-Verapp.: 100–124 (25)More LessAbstractThis paper explores the processes of identity construction and negotiation through face work in a Portuguese Inquisition record, corresponding to the trial for Judaism of Catarina de Orta. Concentrating as much on the inquisitor’s questions as on the answers offered by the defendant, I show here that impoliteness and self-politeness co-occur in interaction in the Portuguese Inquisition courtroom discourse. On the one hand, the inquisitor makes abundant use of impoliteness strategies with at least three main aims: to exert his power over the defendant, to trigger specific negative emotions, and to attack her face and her credibility. On the other hand, the defendant’s answers display numerous features of self-politeness, aimed at saving her face from the inquisitor’s attacks and accusations. It is precisely through the interplay of impoliteness and self-politeness that the two competing narratives proposed by the accuser and the defendant are constructed and re-elaborated during every interrogation.
-
(Im)Politeness in Vedic Sanskrit
Author(s): Francisco Javier Rubio Orecillapp.: 125–155 (31)More LessAbstractThis paper focusses on verbal politeness in the direct speech found in Vedic. Certain impersonalisation strategies typical of classical Sanskrit are already attested here, as third-person polite directives or as the expression of the speaker’s wishes, rather than as direct commands, and represent the maximum degree of illocutionary opacity. Passive syntax, which is a prominent device of indirectness in classical Sanskrit, is still marginal in Vedic. In the analysis of terms of address, a hierarchical but highly flexible politeness-orientated allomorphy can be observed. Moreover, the speaker can, in the same interaction, shift from one level of politeness to another to convey changes in his or her self-perception regarding the level of wisdom that he or she has with respect to an interlocutor (factor [±knowing]); rules marked by social stratification are not found to be decisive, contrary to what has been shown to be the case in post-Vedic normative texts.
-
Review of Brinton (2023): Pragmatics in the History of English
Author(s): Yuanyu Yang and Qiao Huangpp.: 156–164 (9)More LessThis article reviews Pragmatics in the History of English
-
Review of Paternoster (2022): Historical Etiquette: Etiquette Books in Nineteenth-Century Western Cultures
Author(s): Dariusz Krawczykpp.: 165–170 (6)More LessThis article reviews Historical Etiquette: Etiquette Books in Nineteenth-Century Western Cultures
-
Review of Jucker (2020): Politeness in the History of English: From the Middle Ages to the Present Day
Author(s): Mel Evanspp.: 171–174 (4)More LessThis article reviews Politeness in the History of English: From the Middle Ages to the Present Day
Volumes & issues
-
Volume 26 (2025)
-
Volume 25 (2024)
-
Volume 24 (2023)
-
Volume 23 (2022)
-
Volume 22 (2021)
-
Volume 21 (2020)
-
Volume 20 (2019)
-
Volume 19 (2018)
-
Volume 18 (2017)
-
Volume 17 (2016)
-
Volume 16 (2015)
-
Volume 15 (2014)
-
Volume 14 (2013)
-
Volume 13 (2012)
-
Volume 12 (2011)
-
Volume 11 (2010)
-
Volume 10 (2009)
-
Volume 9 (2008)
-
Volume 8 (2007)
-
Volume 7 (2006)
-
Volume 6 (2005)
-
Volume 5 (2004)
-
Volume 4 (2003)
-
Volume 3 (2002)
-
Volume 2 (2001)
-
Volume 1 (2000)
Most Read This Month
