- Home
- e-Journals
- Journal of Language and Politics
- Previous Issues
- Volume 18, Issue 5, 2019
Journal of Language and Politics - Volume 18, Issue 5, 2019
Volume 18, Issue 5, 2019
-
“Immigration, that’s what everyone’s thinking about …”
Author(s): Simona Guerrapp.: 651–670 (20)More LessAbstractThis article examines the 2016 British EU referendum and the domestic debates through citizens’ voices in the media, specifically on the emotions and narratives, on The Guardian, The Daily Telegraph and The Daily Express, the week before the referendum. British citizens felt, in their words, “bullied because of [their] political correctness” and pointed their anger and dissatisfaction against the EU (and Merkel’s) “obsession for open borders”. The analysis underlines that these emotions and narratives, combining immigration and sovereignty, have remained embedded in the post-Brexit days, and go back not just to Billig’s banal nationalism (1995), but show that voting Leave represented respect towards true British values, the “core country” as conceptualised by Taggart (2000). Powellism (Hampshire 2018) and Wright’s “encroanchment” of Englishness (2017), and the analysis on the immigration narrative explain how anti-immigration and sovereignty discourse is persisting and is influencing the social and political relation of Britain with Europe.
-
We can(’t) do this
Author(s): Tim Griebel and Erik Vollmannpp.: 671–697 (27)More LessAbstractMigration has been a defining topic in the discourse in Germany since the so-called “refugee crisis” in 2015. This corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis systematically reconstructs the discourse about migration in two influential German newspapers, thereby emphasizing the construction of different subject positions for people migrating to Germany. Mass media are an important arena for the fight for hegemony between discursive coalitions of culturalization regimes that are based on openness and closure respectively. The discursive space of the German discourse about migration offers multiple opportunities in this regard. In the left-leaning taz, we detect a general trend to support an open society although some (but often contested) elements of closure are detected in this medium as well. Die Welt leans much more towards closure and the problematization of migration although it also offers a diverse array of interpellations that depend on the usefulness or threating character of people coming to Germany.
-
Alignment, ‘politeness’ and implicitness in Chinese political discourse
Author(s): Dániel Z. Kádár and Sen Zhangpp.: 698–717 (20)More LessAbstractThis paper aims to examine the ways in which official Chinese written monologues implicitly trigger alignment with the public in the wake of national social crises. Our understanding of alignment encompasses the attitude of creating an authoritative line of discourse, which in turn triggers the responsive alignment of the receivers with the decision makers. We believe that alignment is a fundamental concept to understand how linguistic politeness operates in political monologues such as gong’gao. Such texts are rich in forms of deference such as honorifics and other ritual phrases used towards Chinese politicians. The reason why such forms of politeness deserve special attention in language and politics is that they are not interpersonal, and their use correlates with implicit communication.
-
I did not say that the government should be plundering anybody’s savings
Author(s): Kiki Yvonne Renardel de Lavalette, Corina Andone and Gerard J. Steenpp.: 718–738 (21)More LessAbstractThis paper examines how politicians employ metaphors to express starting points in British parliamentary debates. Because these metaphors are conceptual tools that may have presuppositions and entailments that are not in line with the ideas and values of all discussion parties, political opponents can resist them by advancing argumentative criticisms. This paper aims to explore how different types of metaphor can be used to express starting points, and how various types of responses can be instrumental to achieving diverging outcomes in the discussion stage at which starting points are commonly decided. To this end, we present a number of case studies of resistance to metaphorically expressed starting points found in British Public Bill Committee debates. Our analysis reveals that metaphors can be important strategies in parliamentary debates when starting points are established between parties, and that resisting them seems to be a pertinent skill.
-
Creating the conditions for human division and structural inequality
Author(s): Nadira Talibpp.: 739–759 (21)More LessAbstractWhile Singapore’s education system claims to implement meritocratic ideals, official statistics indicate that Malay students in Singapore have been underperforming when compared to other ethnic groups (MOE 2012). This statistical representation raises the possibility of a politically induced, systemic inequality as a point of investigation. To investigate this seeming contradiction between the rhetoric and practice of equal educational opportunity, this paper proposes a philosophical and analytical synthesis for examining the 1979 policy report that provides the fundamental basis for Singapore’s streaming education system. In examining this policy development, the analysis draws upon a combination of Foucault’s archaeological method and Critical Discourse Analysis as a way of understanding conditions that made possible the continuous re-construction of new but unequal representation of learners. The findings suggest that complex relations between capability identification, justice, and ethics set the conditions for the appearance and transformation of subject positions necessary to legitimise unequal structural access.
-
Who are we?
Author(s): Jennifer M. Wei and Dr. Ren-feng Duannpp.: 760–781 (22)More LessAbstractThis paper analyzes how political aspirations and convictions during Taiwan’s authoritarian period (from the 1940s to 1996) are expressed through first-person plural pronouns. Combining both corpus-assisted method and discourse historical analysis (DHA, Wodak et al. 1999), we compared the speeches delivered by the presidents – Chiang Kai-shek (CKS, 1955–1975), Chiang Ching-kuo (CCK, 1978–1988), and Lee Teng-hui (LTH, 1989–1996) – from the one-party domination era to the time of the direct presidential elections in 1996. Moreover, by locating lexical items in the co-texts and checking the collocates, we have tried to find referents of we against changing socio-political contexts. The meaning of we has changed from representing Chinese compatriots on the Chinese mainland and the revolutionary militia in CKS’s speeches to an over-inclusion and more hearer-dominant (HD) we in CCK’s speeches. A “wandering we” was found in LTH’s speeches with which a well-defined national collectivity was difficult to identify in the late 1980s.
-
Ericka A. Albaugh and Kathryn M. de Luna (Eds.). (2018) Tracing Language Movement in Africa
Author(s): Yingzhu Chen and Ming Yuepp.: 782–785 (4)More LessThis article reviews Tracing Language Movement in Africa
-
James W. Tollefson and Miguel Pérez-Milans. (2018) The Oxford Handbook of Language Policy and Planning
Author(s): Iair G. Orpp.: 786–789 (4)More LessThis article reviews The Oxford Handbook of Language Policy and Planning
-
Jaffer Sheyholislami (2011). Kurdish Identity, Discourse, and New Media
Author(s): Omer Tekdemirpp.: 790–793 (4)More LessThis article reviews Kurdish Identity, Discourse, and New Media
-
Azad Mammadov. (2018) Studies in Text and Discourse
Author(s): Yunhua Xiangpp.: 794–797 (4)More LessThis article reviews Studies in Text and Discourse
-
Sharon Clampitt-Dunlap. (2018) Language Matters: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Language and Nationalism in Guam, The Philippines, and Puerto Rico
Author(s): Le Cheng and Chen Chengpp.: 798–801 (4)More LessThis article reviews Language Matters: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Language and Nationalism in Guam, The Philippines, and Puerto Rico
Volumes & issues
-
Volume 23 (2024)
-
Volume 22 (2023)
-
Volume 21 (2022)
-
Volume 20 (2021)
-
Volume 19 (2020)
-
Volume 18 (2019)
-
Volume 17 (2018)
-
Volume (2018)
-
Volume 16 (2017)
-
Volume 15 (2016)
-
Volume 14 (2015)
-
Volume 13 (2014)
-
Volume 12 (2013)
-
Volume 11 (2012)
-
Volume 10 (2011)
-
Volume 9 (2010)
-
Volume 8 (2009)
-
Volume 7 (2008)
-
Volume 6 (2007)
-
Volume 5 (2006)
-
Volume 4 (2005)
-
Volume 3 (2004)
-
Volume 2 (2003)
-
Volume 1 (2002)
Most Read This Month
-
-
Radical right-wing parties in Europe
Author(s): Jens Rydgren
-
-
-
Right-wing populism in Europe & USA
Author(s): Ruth Wodak and Michał Krzyżanowski
-
-
-
Uncivility on the web
Author(s): Michał Krzyżanowski and Per Ledin
-
- More Less