- Home
- e-Journals
- Studies in Language. International Journal sponsored by the Foundation “Foundations of Language”
- Previous Issues
- Volume 27, Issue, 2003
Studies in Language. International Journal sponsored by the Foundation “Foundations of Language” - Volume 27, Issue 3, 2003
Volume 27, Issue 3, 2003
-
A semantic analysis of associative plurals
Author(s): Edith A. Moravcsikpp.: 469–503 (35)More LessThe paper presents a general framework for the semantic analysis of nominal plural expressions and assigns a place among them to a lesser-known construction: associative plurals. Six parameters are proposed for identifying the meaning differences among nominal plural expressions. Within this framework, associative plurals are characterized as ranked group plurals that form a single paradigm with first and second person plural pronouns and inclusory (=sylleptic) constructions, all of which are shown to be governed by similar preferences regarding the semantic composition of the group.
-
Nouns, verbs and syntactic backsliding in Khmer
Author(s): John Haiman and Noeurng Ournpp.: 505–528 (24)More LessOne of the difficulties in parsing Khmer is that morphosyntactic clues about the category membership of words are either lacking or misleading. In particular, words which seem to have the status of deverbal nominalizations because of a derivational infix -Vm(n)- are in fact “still”functioning as verbs. It may be that this phenomenon of “syntactic backsliding” provides novel evidence for the hypothesis that this infix was originally meaningless, and that infixation arose in Khmer via the process of “secretion”.
-
On contact-induced grammaticalization
Author(s): Bernd Heine and Tania Kutevapp.: 529–572 (44)More LessGrammaticalization is based on universal strategies of conceptual transfer. Contact-induced language change on the other hand is an areally confined process resulting from specific historical events. What this suggests is that the two constitute quite divergent phenomena and, in fact, in the relevant literature they tend to be described as mutually exclusive processes. Accordingly, this literature abounds with discussions on whether some specific grammatical change is due to the former or the latter. The position taken in this paper is that the two are in no way mutually exclusive; rather, perhaps more often than not, they jointly conspire in triggering grammatical change.
-
Topic, focus, and discourse structure: Ancient Greek Word Order
Author(s): Dejan Matićpp.: 573–633 (61)More LessIt is commonly assumed that word order in free word order languages is determined by a simple topic – focus dichotomy. Analysis of data from Ancient Greek, a language with an extreme word order flexibility, reveals that matters are more complex: the parameters of discourse structure and semantics interact with information packaging and are thus indirectly also responsible for word order variation. Furthermore, Ancient Greek displays a number of synonymous word order patterns, which points to the co-existence of pragmatic determinedness and free variation in this language. The strict one-to-one correspondence between word order and information structure, assumed for the languages labelled discourse configurational, thus turns out to be only one of the possible relationships between form and pragmatic content.
-
The relationship between demonstratives and interrogatives
Author(s): Holger Diesselpp.: 635–655 (21)More LessThis paper examines two types of expressions that seem to exist in all languages, demonstratives and interrogatives. Based on a representative sample of 100 languages it is shown that demonstratives and interrogatives have some striking features in common. They cross-cut the boundaries of several word classes and encode the same semantic features: person, thing, place, direction, manner, time, and amount. It is the central hypothesis of this study that the crosslinguistic parallelism between demonstratives and interrogatives is motivated by their pragmatic functions: both initiate a search for information that is guided by their semantic and syntactic features. Further, it is argued that demonstratives and interrogatives have a special status in language. Although both types of expressions are commonly considered grammatical markers, they do not serve an ordinary grammatical function. Grammatical markers organize the information flow in the ongoing discourse, whereas basic demonstratives and interrogatives are immediately concerned with the speaker-hearer interaction.
Volumes & issues
-
Volume 49 (2025)
-
Volume 48 (2024)
-
Volume 47 (2023)
-
Volume 46 (2022)
-
Volume 45 (2021)
-
Volume 44 (2020)
-
Volume 43 (2019)
-
Volume 42 (2018)
-
Volume 41 (2017)
-
Volume 40 (2016)
-
Volume 39 (2015)
-
Volume 38 (2014)
-
Volume 37 (2013)
-
Volume 36 (2012)
-
Volume 35 (2011)
-
Volume 34 (2010)
-
Volume 33 (2009)
-
Volume 32 (2008)
-
Volume 31 (2007)
-
Volume 30 (2006)
-
Volume 29 (2005)
-
Volume 28 (2004)
-
Volume 27 (2003)
-
Volume 26 (2002)
-
Volume 25 (2001)
-
Volume 24 (2000)
-
Volume 23 (1999)
-
Volume 22 (1998)
-
Volume 21 (1997)
-
Volume 20 (1996)
-
Volume 19 (1995)
-
Volume 18 (1994)
-
Volume 17 (1993)
-
Volume 16 (1992)
-
Volume 15 (1991)
-
Volume 14 (1990)
-
Volume 13 (1989)
-
Volume 12 (1988)
-
Volume 11 (1987)
-
Volume 10 (1986)
-
Volume 9 (1985)
-
Volume 8 (1984)
-
Volume 7 (1983)
-
Volume 6 (1982)
-
Volume 5 (1981)
-
Volume 4 (1980)
-
Volume 3 (1979)
-
Volume 2 (1978)
-
Volume 1 (1977)
Most Read This Month
Article
content/journals/15699978
Journal
10
5
false

-
-
On thetical grammar
Author(s): Gunther Kaltenböck, Bernd Heine and Tania Kuteva
-
-
-
Where Have all the Adjectives Gone?
Author(s): R.M.W. Dixon
-
-
-
On contact-induced grammaticalization
Author(s): Bernd Heine and Tania Kuteva
-
-
-
Irrealis and the Subjunctive
Author(s): T. Givón
-
- More Less