- Home
- e-Journals
- ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
- Previous Issues
- Volume 156, Issue 1, 2008
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics - Volume 156, Issue 1, 2008
Volume 156, Issue 1, 2008
-
Global Simulation and Writing Self-Beliefs of Intermediate French Students
Author(s): Nicole Mills and Mélanie Péronpp.: 239–273 (35)More LessAbstractGlobal simulation is described as “simultaneously an approach, a set of classroom techniques, and the conceptual framework for a syllabus” (Levine, 2004, p. 27). Students create a fictive yet culturally grounded world, assume the role of a self-developed character, and collaborate with fellow community members (Magnin, 1997). Despite its numerous cited advantages, there are no known empirical studies evaluating the influence of global simulation on language learners. This study evaluated how global simulation influenced the development of intermediate-French students’ writing self-beliefs and text quality. Significant differences were found in Intermediate French students’ writing self-efficacy, writing self-concept, writing anxiety, and text quality in organization, content, and creativity after participation in a global simulation curriculum. No significant differences were found in students’ self-efficacy for self-regulation, perceived value of writing, or text quality in grammar and expression. Implications for researchers and educators are discussed.
-
The Effect of Direct and Indirect Corrective Feedback on L2 Learners’ Written Accuracy
Author(s): C.G. van Beuningen, N.H. de Jong and F. Kuikenpp.: 279–296 (18)More LessAbstractAmong scholars there is disagreement on the benefits of corrective feedback on second language learners’ written output. While some researchers advocate the usefulness of corrective feedback, Truscott claims that all error correction is unnecessary, ineffective, and even harmful, in that it diverts time and energy away from more productive aspects of writing instruction. Until now, research outcomes cannot settle this debate since only short-term effectiveness of corrective feedback could be demonstrated. Due to methodological shortcomings, results from studies that investigated long-term effects of error correction on accuracy improvement are inconclusive.
By trying to overcome some of these design related drawbacks (i.e. the lack of a proper control group and time-on task differences between treatment groups), the present study intends to make a contribution to the ongoing error correction debate. The effectiveness of direct and indirect corrective feedback was compared to the effect of two control treatments: a treatment that offered students an extra opportunity to practice their writing skills, and a treatment in which students self-corrected their errors without any available feedback. Results show that corrective feedback can be effective in improving students’ accuracy: while short-term effects were found for both direct and indirect corrective feedback, only direct feedback proved to have a significant long-term effect. Neither of the control treatments had a significant effect on students’ accuracy.
-
Strategic and Interactive Writing Instruction (SIWI)
Author(s): Kimberly A. Wolbers Ph.D.pp.: 299–326 (28)More LessAbstractThis study investigates the effects of using Strategic and Interactive Writing Instruction (SIWI) with deaf, middle school students who use American Sign Language as their L1 and written English as L2. Using a pretest-posttest control group design, the research explores whether students receiving SIWI made significantly greater gains compared to those not receiving SIWI on a number of variables. There were 33 total students, 16 in the treatment group and 17 in the comparison group. The intervention lasted a total of 8 weeks, during which time the treatment group collaboratively constructed two report papers using SIWI components, and the comparison group continued with their typical literacy instruction. The pre and posttest measures were scored, according to rubrics, for evidence of primary traits, contextual language, and conventions. The multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and follow-up univariate analyses were statistically significant. Furthermore, effect sizes (d) were large to very large, ranging from 1.27 to 2.65, indicating SIWI to be an effective approach with deaf L2 writers.
-
Book reviews
Author(s): P. Pauwelspp.: 331–334 (4)More LessThis article reviews Academic Writing in a Foreign Language. An extended Genre Analysis of Student Texts
-
Book reviews
Author(s): K. Blanpainpp.: 335–337 (3)More LessThis article reviews Goals for Academic Writing: ESL Students and their Instructors
-
Book reviews
Author(s): T. De Ryckerpp.: 339–348 (10)More LessThis article reviews Letter Writing
Volumes & issues
-
Volume 175 (2024)
-
Volume 174 (2023)
-
Volume 173 (2022)
-
Volume 172 (2021)
-
Volume 171 (2020)
-
Volume 170 (2019)
-
Volume 169 (2018)
-
Volume 168 (2017)
-
Volume 167 (2016)
-
Volume 166 (2015)
-
Volume 165 (2014)
-
Volume 164 (2012)
-
Volume 163 (2012)
-
Volume 162 (2011)
-
Volume 161 (2011)
-
Volume 160 (2010)
-
Volume 159 (2010)
-
Volume 158 (2009)
-
Volume 157 (2009)
-
Volume 156 (2008)
-
Volume 155 (2008)
-
Volume 154 (2007)
-
Volume 153 (2007)
-
Volume 152 (2006)
-
Volume 151 (2006)
-
Volume 149 (2005)
-
Volume 147 (2004)
-
Volume 145 (2004)
-
Volume 143 (2004)
-
Volume 141 (2003)
-
Volume 139 (2003)
-
Volume 137 (2002)
-
Volume 135 (2002)
-
Volume 133 (2001)
-
Volume 131 (2001)
-
Volume 129 (2000)
-
Volume 127 (2000)
-
Volume 125 (1999)
-
Volume 123 (1999)
-
Volume 121 (1998)
-
Volume 119 (1998)
-
Volume 117 (1997)
-
Volume 115 (1997)
-
Volume 113 (1996)
-
Volume 111 (1996)
-
Volume 109 (1995)
-
Volume 107 (1995)
-
Volume 105 (1994)
-
Volume 103 (1994)
-
Volume 101 (1993)
-
Volume 99 (1993)
-
Volume 97 (1992)
-
Volume 95 (1992)
-
Volume 93 (1991)
-
Volume 91 (1991)
-
Volume 89 (1990)
-
Volume 87 (1990)
-
Volume 85 (1989)
-
Volume 83 (1989)
-
Volume 81 (1988)
-
Volume 79 (1988)
-
Volume 77 (1987)
-
Volume 76 (1987)
-
Volume 75 (1987)
-
Volume 74 (1986)
-
Volume 73 (1986)
-
Volume 72 (1986)
-
Volume 71 (1986)
-
Volume 70 (1985)
-
Volume 69 (1985)
-
Volume 67 (1985)
-
Volume 66 (1985)
-
Volume 65 (1984)
-
Volume 64 (1984)
-
Volume 63 (1984)
-
Volume 62 (1983)
-
Volume 60 (1983)
-
Volume 59 (1983)
-
Volume 58 (1982)
-
Volume 57 (1982)
-
Volume 56 (1982)
-
Volume 55 (1982)
-
Volume 54 (1981)
-
Volume 53 (1981)
-
Volume 52 (1981)
-
Volume 51 (1981)
-
Volume 49 (1980)
-
Volume 48 (1980)
-
Volume 47 (1980)
-
Volume 45 (1979)
-
Volume 44 (1979)
-
Volume 43 (1979)
-
Volume 41 (1978)
-
Volume 39 (1978)
-
Volume 38 (1977)
-
Volume 37 (1977)
-
Volume 36 (1977)
-
Volume 35 (1977)
-
Volume 34 (1976)
-
Volume 33 (1976)
-
Volume 32 (1976)
-
Volume 31 (1976)
-
Volume 30 (1975)
-
Volume 29 (1975)
-
Volume 28 (1975)
-
Volume 27 (1975)
-
Volume 25 (1974)
-
Volume 24 (1974)
-
Volume 23 (1974)
-
Volume 22 (1973)
-
Volume 21 (1973)
-
Volume 20 (1973)
-
Volume 19 (1973)
-
Volume 18 (1972)
-
Volume 17 (1972)
-
Volume 16 (1972)
-
Volume 15 (1972)
-
Volume 14 (1971)
-
Volume 13 (1971)
-
Volume 12 (1971)
-
Volume 11 (1971)
-
Volume 10 (1970)
-
Volume 9 (1970)
-
Volume 8 (1970)
-
Volume 7 (1970)
-
Volume 6 (1969)
-
Volume 5 (1969)
-
Volume 4 (1969)
-
Volume 3 (1969)
-
Volume 2 (1968)
-
Volume 1 (1968)
Most Read This Month

-
-
The updated Vocabulary Levels Test
Author(s): Stuart Webb, Yosuke Sasao and Oliver Ballance
-
- More Less