- Home
- e-Journals
- ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
- Previous Issues
- Volume 166, Issue, 2015
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics - Volume 166, Issue 1, 2015
Volume 166, Issue 1, 2015
-
Developing research expertise in applied linguistics
Author(s): Alison Wray and Mike Wallacepp.: 3–36 (34)More LessThis paper explores the ambiguous nature of applied linguistics as a field of enquiry, to contextualise the interpretation of data from an empirical study into how research expertise in applied linguistics is conceptualised, and how it develops during an academic’s career. Key findings from the study include the importance of being willing to work at the boundaries of one’s knowledge, the capacity to communicate one’s ideas effectively, and the role of a good quality research environment for developing knowledge, skills and confidence. It is proposed that these features fit well with the modern imperative of addressing the world’s major problems though a cross-disciplinary approach to research, putting applied linguists into a strong position to contribute to new research knowledge.
-
The impact of PPP and TBLT on Vietnamese students’ writing performance and self-regulatory writing strategies
Author(s): Hoang Yen Phuong, Kris Van den Branden, Elke Van Steendam and Lies Sercupp.: 37–93 (57)More LessWhile the available research literature appears to support the implementation of task-based language teaching (TBLT) in Western countries, few studies have been conducted to investigate its impact on classroom practice in Asia, especially in comparison with the presentation-practice-production (PPP) approach which many Asian teachers still favour. The current study explores the differential effects of the PPP approach and a task-based approach on Vietnamese students’ writing performance and self-regulation while writing descriptive and argumentative paragraphs. The study involved 138 students of English Language Studies at a university in Vietnam. Results show that both approaches are effective in enhancing students’ text quality. The students in the PPP condition had significantly higher scores on linguistic accuracy in the immediate posttest than the students in the TBLT condition. Conversely, students in the TBLT groups had significantly higher scores on lexical diversity in the immediate posttest than the students in the PPP condition. With regard to self-regulation, the students in the TBLT condition had significantly higher scores on the immediate posttest than the students in the PPP condition .
-
How much collocation knowledge do L2 learners have?
Author(s): Beatriz González Fernández and Norbert Schmittpp.: 94–126 (33)More LessMany scholars believe that collocations are difficult to learn and use by L2 learners. However, some research suggests that learners often know more collocations than commonly thought. This study tested 108 Spanish learners of English to measure their productive knowledge of 50 collocations, which varied according to corpus frequency, t-score, and MI score. The participants produced a mean score of 56.6% correct, suggesting that our learners knew a substantial number of collocations. Knowledge of the collocations correlated moderately with corpus frequency (.45), but also with everyday engagement with English outside the classroom, in activities like reading, watching movies/TV, and social networking (composite correlation = .56). Everyday engagement also had a stronger relationship with collocation knowledge than years of English study (.45).
-
A process-focused learning model for L2 vocabulary acquisition
Author(s): Qing Mapp.: 127–162 (36)More LessThis study aims to identify essential stages involved in vocabulary learning by constructing, implementing and validating a process-focused learning model using structural equation modelling (SEM). In this model, successful vocabulary learning goes through four sequential stages: perceiving the word form; accessing the word meaning; mapping the word form with meaning; using the word. A vocabulary learning strategy questionnaire was developed based on the model and administered to more than 300 Chinese university students; the model was satisfactorily tested using the SEM technique. The empirical findings provide further insights into our understanding of the complex nature of vocabulary acquisition which forms a systematic learning loop. A number of learning and teaching implications were drawn accordingly to enhance L2 vocabulary acquisition and vocabulary learning strategy training programmes.
-
Lexicogrammatical features of adverbs in advanced learner English
Author(s): Hilde Hasselgårdpp.: 163–189 (27)More LessThis paper explores the use of -ly adverbs by Norwegian advanced learners of English compared to that of native speakers. The investigation is based on two corpora of novice academic English: VESPA and BAWE. It considers features of lexis (frequencies, style, meanings, collocational patterns) as well as of syntax, i.e. whether the adverbs function as adjuncts, disjuncts, conjuncts or modifiers in adjective or adverb phrases. The learners make few clear mistakes with adverbs, but there are important frequency differences between the corpora concerning lexical choice and semantic and syntactic functions. Learners overuse adverbs with modal meaning but underuse phrase-modifying adverbs. Most adjunct types are also underused. At several points, the native speakers prove to have a greater lexical repertoire.
Volumes & issues
-
Volume 175 (2024)
-
Volume 174 (2023)
-
Volume 173 (2022)
-
Volume 172 (2021)
-
Volume 171 (2020)
-
Volume 170 (2019)
-
Volume 169 (2018)
-
Volume 168 (2017)
-
Volume 167 (2016)
-
Volume 166 (2015)
-
Volume 165 (2014)
-
Volume 164 (2012)
-
Volume 163 (2012)
-
Volume 162 (2011)
-
Volume 161 (2011)
-
Volume 160 (2010)
-
Volume 159 (2010)
-
Volume 158 (2009)
-
Volume 157 (2009)
-
Volume 156 (2008)
-
Volume 155 (2008)
-
Volume 154 (2007)
-
Volume 153 (2007)
-
Volume 152 (2006)
-
Volume 151 (2006)
-
Volume 149 (2005)
-
Volume 147 (2004)
-
Volume 145 (2004)
-
Volume 143 (2004)
-
Volume 141 (2003)
-
Volume 139 (2003)
-
Volume 137 (2002)
-
Volume 135 (2002)
-
Volume 133 (2001)
-
Volume 131 (2001)
-
Volume 129 (2000)
-
Volume 127 (2000)
-
Volume 125 (1999)
-
Volume 123 (1999)
-
Volume 121 (1998)
-
Volume 119 (1998)
-
Volume 117 (1997)
-
Volume 115 (1997)
-
Volume 113 (1996)
-
Volume 111 (1996)
-
Volume 109 (1995)
-
Volume 107 (1995)
-
Volume 105 (1994)
-
Volume 103 (1994)
-
Volume 101 (1993)
-
Volume 99 (1993)
-
Volume 97 (1992)
-
Volume 95 (1992)
-
Volume 93 (1991)
-
Volume 91 (1991)
-
Volume 89 (1990)
-
Volume 87 (1990)
-
Volume 85 (1989)
-
Volume 83 (1989)
-
Volume 81 (1988)
-
Volume 79 (1988)
-
Volume 77 (1987)
-
Volume 76 (1987)
-
Volume 75 (1987)
-
Volume 74 (1986)
-
Volume 73 (1986)
-
Volume 72 (1986)
-
Volume 71 (1986)
-
Volume 70 (1985)
-
Volume 69 (1985)
-
Volume 67 (1985)
-
Volume 66 (1985)
-
Volume 65 (1984)
-
Volume 64 (1984)
-
Volume 63 (1984)
-
Volume 62 (1983)
-
Volume 60 (1983)
-
Volume 59 (1983)
-
Volume 58 (1982)
-
Volume 57 (1982)
-
Volume 56 (1982)
-
Volume 55 (1982)
-
Volume 54 (1981)
-
Volume 53 (1981)
-
Volume 52 (1981)
-
Volume 51 (1981)
-
Volume 49 (1980)
-
Volume 48 (1980)
-
Volume 47 (1980)
-
Volume 45 (1979)
-
Volume 44 (1979)
-
Volume 43 (1979)
-
Volume 41 (1978)
-
Volume 39 (1978)
-
Volume 38 (1977)
-
Volume 37 (1977)
-
Volume 36 (1977)
-
Volume 35 (1977)
-
Volume 34 (1976)
-
Volume 33 (1976)
-
Volume 32 (1976)
-
Volume 31 (1976)
-
Volume 30 (1975)
-
Volume 29 (1975)
-
Volume 28 (1975)
-
Volume 27 (1975)
-
Volume 25 (1974)
-
Volume 24 (1974)
-
Volume 23 (1974)
-
Volume 22 (1973)
-
Volume 21 (1973)
-
Volume 20 (1973)
-
Volume 19 (1973)
-
Volume 18 (1972)
-
Volume 17 (1972)
-
Volume 16 (1972)
-
Volume 15 (1972)
-
Volume 14 (1971)
-
Volume 13 (1971)
-
Volume 12 (1971)
-
Volume 11 (1971)
-
Volume 10 (1970)
-
Volume 9 (1970)
-
Volume 8 (1970)
-
Volume 7 (1970)
-
Volume 6 (1969)
-
Volume 5 (1969)
-
Volume 4 (1969)
-
Volume 3 (1969)
-
Volume 2 (1968)
-
Volume 1 (1968)
Most Read This Month

-
-
The updated Vocabulary Levels Test
Author(s): Stuart Webb, Yosuke Sasao and Oliver Ballance
-
- More Less