- Home
- e-Journals
- Evolutionary Linguistic Theory
- Previous Issues
- Volume 5, Issue 2, 2023
Evolutionary Linguistic Theory - Volume 5, Issue 2, 2023
Volume 5, Issue 2, 2023
-
Pragmatics in the Minimalist framework
Author(s): Alessandra Giorgipp.: 103–127 (25)More LessAbstractThis article explores the relationship between pragmatics and the other components of grammar. Specifically, it aims to determine whether pragmatics is a distinct module of grammar coming into play at some point in the derivation process to connect the sentence with the context. The conclusion is that, based on the phenomena considered in this work, pragmatics rather than being a separate module, is distributed in the various components. It is shown in fact that the context immediately intervenes at the representative level to yield the correct syntax to be fed to the sensorimotor system on one side, and to the conceptual one on the other. The empirical focus of the article is on a specific type of questions in Italian, namely surprise and surprise-disapproval questions, because they are most sensitive to pragmatic factors. The syntactic, prosodic, and gestural components of these constructions will be examined, highlighting their most important characteristics.
-
Raising to object
Author(s): Diego Gabriel Krivochenpp.: 128–161 (34)More LessAbstractIn this paper we provide an introduction to a set of tools for syntactic analysis based on graph theory, and apply them to the study of some properties of English accusativus cum infinitivo constructions, more commonly known as raising to object or exceptional case marking structures. We focus on puzzling extraction asymmetries between base-generated objects and ‘raised’ objects and on the interaction between raising to object and Right Wrap. We argue that a lexicalised derivational grammar with grammatical functions as primitives delivers empirically adequate analyses.
-
Reconsidering linguistic nativism from an interdisciplinary, emergentist perspective
Author(s): Michael Breylpp.: 162–193 (32)More LessAbstractFor decades, interdisciplinary research efforts have accumulated insights that diminish the significance of the classic nature versus nurture dichotomy, instead calling for a nuanced, multifactorial approach to ontogeny. Similarly, the role of genes in both phylogeny and ontogeny, once seen as rather deterministic, is now conceptualized as highly dependent on environmental factors, including behavior. Linguistic theories have, in principle, made an effort to incorporate these changing views. However, the central claim of the given paper is that this apparent compliance with biological insights remains superficial. As such, considerable disconnects between linguistic theory and what is known about the biological underpinnings of complex traits persist, negatively impacting pertinent views on language acquisition, language universals and the evolution of language. Given the breadth of these fields of study, the aim of this paper is to tackle the root of the problem: It begins by sketching out linguistic nativism as conceptualized within generativism, pointing to aspects within this position that stand in conflict with the interdisciplinary literature. It will then review select areas of research in a succinct manner in order to substantiate the criticism and characterize the counterposition as found within the biological sciences. The paper will culminate in addressing these disconnects on conceptual grounds, i.e. invoking the term emergence as employed in neuroscience as a possible means to reconcile those biological insights with linguistic nativism.
Volumes & issues
Most Read This Month
-
-
Construction grammar for monkeys?
Author(s): Michael Pleyer and Stefan Hartmann
-
-
-
On the nature of roots
Author(s): Phoevos Panagiotidis
-
-
-
Grammar change
Author(s): Hubert Haider
-
- More Less